Reunion East Community

Development District

Agenda

July 13, 2017

l> C)

m z

C )>

'--. ,r

Reunion East

Community Development District

135

W. Central Blvd., Suite

Phone: 407-841-5524-

320, Fax:

Orlando FL,

407-839-1526

32801

July

6,

2017

Board of

Reunion

Supervisors

East Community

Development

District

Dear

Board Members:

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors	of the Reunion East Community Development	
District will be held Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. at the Heritage Crossing Community	
Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion,	FL. Following is the advance agenda for the	
meeting:		

1. 2.

Roll Call

Public Comment

Period

3. 4. 5. 6.

Approval of the Minutes of the	June 8, 2017 Meeting	
Discussion and Consideration of CDD Signage	
Consideration of Proposal(s) to	Replace Speaker System	
Discussion  of  CDD  Property	Landscape  Conditions	
(Requested by Supervisor Harding)	

at Seven Eagles Pool

and  Need  for  Improvements

7.

Staff Reports

A.  Attorney

B.	Engineer

C.  District Manager's

Report

8. 9. 10. 11.

i.	Action Items List

ii.  Approval of Check Register

iii.  Balance Sheet and Income Statement

iv.	Status of Direct Bill Assessments

Other Business

Supervisor's Requests

Next Meeting Date

Adjournment

The

second

order

of

business

is

the

Public

Comment

Period

where

the

public

has

an

opportunity to be heard and any other items.

on

propositions

coming

before the Board as reflected

on

the agenda,

The third order of business is the approval minutes are enclosed for your review.

of the

minutes

of

the

June 8, 2017 meeting.  The

The fourth order of business is the discussion and consideration of	
Resort  will	be	presenting	proposed  standard  sign  design	and	
meeting.					

CDD signage. The Reunion requested locations at the

The fifth order of the Seven Eagles review.

business is the	
Pool.	A copy	

consideration of proposal(s) to replace of the proposal(s) and location map

the are

speaker enclosed

system at for your

The sixth order of business is the discussion of the	
need for  improvements	by Yellowstone.   This  is	
material is available.		

CDD property landscape conditions an open discussion item and no

and back

the -up

The seventh	order	of business is Staff Reports. Section 1 of	the District Manager's Report is the	
presentation	and discussion of the action items list.	A copy of the list is enclosed for your	
review.   Section 2	is the check register for approval	and	Section 3 is the	balance sheet	and	
income  statement.	Both  items  will  be  provided  under	separate  cover.	Section  4  is	the	
discussion of the status of the direct bill assessment collections.	A table	with the direct bill	
information is enclosed for your review.						

The balance of the agenda will be discussed questions, please contact me.

at

the meeting.

In

the

meantime,

if

you

have

any

Sincerely,	~ s		
n-			
George S.	Flint		
District Manager		

(..__:-

Cc:	Jan Carpenter, District Counsel
Steve Boyd, District Engineer

Enclosures

;
.

.....

~ z c::

-=i m

(/)

MINUTES OF MEETING REUNION EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Regular Meeting	of the  Board of	Supervisors  of the  Reunion	
Development District was held on Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 2:30 p.m.	at the	
Community Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion, Florida.		
Present and constituting a quorum were:			
Carlton Grant		Chairman		
Mark Greenstein		Vice Chairman by phone	
Steven Goldstein		Assistant Treasurer		
John Dryburgh		Assistant Secretary		
Don Harding		Assistant Secretary		
Also present were:				

East  Community

Heritage Crossing

George Flint	District Manager

Jan Carpenter	District Counsel

Andrew d' Adesky	District Counsel

Steve Boyd	District Engineer

Alan Scheerer	Field Manager

Garold Williams	Security

Rob Stultz	Yellowstone Landscape

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call

Mr. Grant called the meeting to order, and Mr. Flint called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period

There not being any, the next item as followed.

TIDRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes

2017 Meeting

of

the May 11,

Mr. Flint: Are there any additions, deletions, or corrections to those minutes? Not hearing any, we need a motion to approve.

On MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded by Mr. Dryburgh, with all in favor, the minutes of the May 11, 2017 meeting were approved.

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 2

2017 of 14

FOURTH

ORDER

OF

BUSINESS

Consideration	of	Work  Authorization	
from  Boyd Civil Engineering for Work	
Related	to	the	Excitement   Drive	
Gatehouse				

Mr.	Flint:  Next is the continuing saga of the gatehouse on Excitement Drive.  We have		
your agreement, as well as the surveyor's proposal.	I think where we left it was there were		
discussions with the County to see the feasibility before we obligated ourselves to it.			
Mr.	Boyd:	I	approached the County but I haven't received a response.	I don't see		
anything about the project that alerts the County to any problems, because they approved it as a		
non-gated access to begin with.					
Mr.	Dryburgh:	What seems to be cropping up, is that many of the residents in that area		
don't want it,  so	before we go too far down the path, as  I mentioned at the  last meeting,		
shouldn't we be surveying the people who are going to be impacted to see if they want to spend		
this kind of money on a project like this.  If you find that the majority of them want it, great.  If		
you find the majority don't want it, why are we wasting our money on it?			
Mr.	Harding:	This morning, Alan and Garold and I met by the back gate with the sign		
guy that was making this large sign that's going to be comparable to other signs that we have.		
Garold talked about where he thought it would be the right place to put it.  We really think that		
might be the solution to the whole issue.  I believe on the 16	th			
	, they are coming in and installing		
the sign.								
Mr.	Scheerer:  Yes sir.					
Mr.	Harding:  Garold and I are going to be there.				
Mr.	Scheerer:  And myself.					
Mr.	Harding:	We are going to put up the sign.	I think you talked about even putting in		
some lighting.							
Mr.	Scheerer:	Yeah, there's some electrical there.  There's actually enough light, a 120		
volt LED light that's in the location that the sign is going to go, so we can easily have our		
electrician come out and provide another LED light in front	of the sign, once it's been installed,		
so that the sign is visible throughout the evening hours, as well.			
Mr.	Harding:	Correct me if I'm wrong, but Garold really believes that's going to be a		
major solution to the problem.					
Mr.	Goldstein:	I'm having second thoughts before it turns out to be a main gate.  I don't		
want all of that traffic coming through my street, quite honestly.			

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 3

2017 of 14

Mr.	Scheerer:	It	won't increase traffic.			
Mr.	Goldstein:	I hadn't really thought about that before and I'm the one who's pushing	
it the hardest.  I think at this point, it makes sense to put a sign in and see what happens for a	
couple of months.  Let's	table this for a couple of months, before we spend the money.	
Mr.	Dryburgh:	I think just having a security car there really reduced the issue.	
Mr.	Harding:	I think the sign will probably eliminate the need for that.  I think Garold	
thinks that too.								
Mr.	Dryburgh:	The sign is located in such a fashion.  Is the sign going to be positioned	
early enough to stop a semi?				
Mr.	Scheerer:		Yes.	As you look at that location, which all homeowners are familiar	
with, there's an upfront median, split and the median after that for the gatehouse was being	
considered.  The front median just has one sign, with one pole.  The sign basically says that it's	
a divided road and to stay right.  That sign will go directly behind that.  Trust me, you can see it	
coming both ways on	S.	Old Lake Wilson Road.  It won't be a problem.		
Mr.	Dryburgh:		So semi drivers would see it.			
Mr.	Scheerer:	The sign is over 6 feet tall.			
Mr.	Dryburgh:		Perfect.  That's the largest sign.			
Mr.	Goldstein:		I prefer to table this until we see what happens.		
Mr.	Dryburgh:  Do we need a motion to table?			
Mr.	Flint:  I don't think so.				
Mr.	d' Adesky:		Not	to table.  It's	a Board direction.			
Mr.	Greenstein:		I'm  hearing	what  everyone	is  saying.	I  believe  Steve  just	
recommended tabling the issue for a few months based upon these actions that we are taking.  I	
totally agree with that.	I just want to remind everyone, and I think I'm	right in saying this, that	
if the gatehouse goes up there, we have	to inspect and welcome all visitors.  That entrance was	
never anticipated, nor do I think that it would warrant having anybody other than residents into	
that gate.									
Mr.	Harding:  We are all in agreement on that right now and we will put the sign up.	
Mr.	Greenstein:	Great.				
Mr.	Harding:	I	don't know if you heard that it can be lit at night.  Alan thinks that we	
can put some fairly simple lighting in there.			
Mr.	Scheerer:  Yes sir.				

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

Mr. Greenstein:  Great, thank you.

June 8,

Page 4

2017 of 14

FIFTH

ORDER

OF

BUSINESS

Discussion	of  Proposed  Beautification	
Projects	(Requested	by	Supervisor	
Harding)				

A. B. C.

Larger Reunion Signage at Sinclair Road Exit and Rear Gate Entrance Stone Walls with Signage at Community Entrances

Consideration of Request to Reunion West CDD for Installation of Fountains in Heritage Preserve Pond

Mr. discussion.

Flint:  There were several items that Mr. Harding brought up and emailed me for

Mr.	Harding:	Yes.  We had a major property owner in here that wanted to put some		
more stone signs up.	I think they thought that maybe we needed them on the east side as well.		
Then they were talking about the Dowling Brothers.  They own something like 35 properties.		
They had a recommendation on the pond for fountains, way back when.  They want us to put		
these stone signs at various community entrances.  As it turns out, we have them on the east side		
at Carriage Pointe, Homestead, Liberty Bluff and Patriots Landing.  Where we don't have them,		
from what I understand, is at Fairway Ridge North, Fairway Ridge South, Heritage Preserve and		
Legends Corner, which is on the west side.  The other thing that they were looking at, along		
with these signs, is also putting some fountains in the Heritage Preserve pond, which is on the		
west side.	I got back to them after I looked into this more, and I had some conversations with		
Alan too.	If anything, it's going to have to be a Reunion West CDD Board decision.  From		
what I understand from Dowling Brothers, they want to come to the next Reunion West CDD		
meeting and make a	presentation.  They are actually offering to pay for some of this as well.		
				
We will have to allow the Reunion West CDD Board to discuss this and see what they want to		
do.				

Mr. Dryburgh:  Is there a sign like this for Heritage Crossing?	
Mr.	Scheerer:  Yes.  Its right out front, when you turn in, on either side.	
Mr.	Harding:	That's not considered a community.	It's a condominium.	
condominiums are covered as well.		
Mr.	Scheerer:	Yes.  Ever condominium and every single-family home on	
has a block sign with marble.		
Mr.	Harding:  Its only on the west side where they don't have stone signs.	

All of the

the east side

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 5

2017 of 14

Mr. Scheerer:  That is correct.		
Mr. Harding:  We are well covered on the east side, so we will let that be a west side	
project, including the fountains.			
Mr. Grant:  The only comment I might add is, much like the sign discussion, there are	
standards to the existing signs; the marble insert, the logo and brick face.	I would recommend	
that we don't come up with a different standard, or let someone from the	outside come in with	
their signs and it continues with the Reunion standard that we have established.	
Mr.  Greenstein:   You  are  absolutely  right,  Carlton.   Regarding  the  signage  at  the	
entrance to each of the major communities, I think we definitely have to touch base with Daniel	
Baker.  I did discuss this with him some time ago and we just need to resurrect it.  Hopefully	
now the time is right to have the west entrances be similar to the east entrances.	
Mr. Harding:  Okay, because the LRA has to approve all of those kinds of things.	
Mr. Flint:  Not really.			
Mr. Harding:	I	don't know.		
Mr. Greenstein:	I think	it was more of an issue of the developer putting them on the east	
side and they just weren't done	on the west side.  We certainly need to review where we stand	
with how to move forward on that.		
Mr. Harding:  Okay.			
Mr. Flint:  That will probably be a west expense.  I don't see that as a shared expense	
because you have monuments here; therefore, it would be a west issue.		
Mr. Harding:	I will try to attend the next Reunion West CDD meeting and bring it up, if	
they don't have it on	the agenda.  I don't know if you can put it on their agenda or not.	
Mr. Flint:  I can ask the Chairman.		
Mr. Dryburgh:	You can	ask the Chairman and see what they want to do.	
Mr. Goldstein:	I think it's pretty simple.  If they want to put the signage in and pay for	
it, that's fme.					
Mr. Flint:  Honestly, they are all public meetings.  At the beginning of every meeting is	
a public comment section and that would be the best way for them to handle that.	
Mr. Harding:  Okay, we	will do it that way.  I've already given feedback.	
Ms. Carpenter:  Is it all CDD land that the signs are on?		
Mr. Harding:  Yes.			
Mr. Flint:  I don't know.	We will have to look at where they would be.	

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 6

2017 of 14

Mr. Boyd:	It depends on where they want to put them at.  They	
locations first.		
Mr. Harding:  They are reaching out to vendors and everything.	
their thing.		

have

We

to determine

will let them

the

do

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.	Attorney

Staff Reports

Mr. Flint:  Next is Staff Reports.		
Mr. d' Adesky: The only thing that I have to report is on the one action item.  We are	
trying to pin down the exact time to have a meeting with Osceola County.  We have been touch	
and go with them on the phone regarding the right-of-way.  People are	on vacation and we are	
trying to make sure that everyone is available at the same time.  We anticipate trying to get a	
meeting set next month with them to discuss those right-of-way costs.	That's something that	
I've discussed previously and you knew that it was coming.   Supervisor Harding is already	
delegated on that, so we really don't need to take any action at this time.  Just know that this is	
coming.		
Ms. Carpenter:  I ran into Dave Tomek at the County and talked it over with him.  He	
acknowledged that it is an issue that they should be open to, so really, it's just a matter of being	
able to get time with them.		
Mr. Flint:  They just cut a bunch of Oak trees down.  Did you see that?	
Mr. Boyd:  Yes.  That is for their exit and deceleration lanes.		

B.

Engineer

There being none, the next item followed.

C.

District Manager's Report	
i.	Action Items List	

Mr. Flint: On the action item list is Water Management District and Toho on comments from the County before we go significant changes to the plans. Mr. Boyd: That is correct.

the irrigation turnover. The LRA that issue. On the signalization, through the bidding process, in

is dealing with the we are waiting on case there are any

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,	2017	
Page 7	of14	

Mr. substantial this point. Mr. us?

Flint: We are waiting on County comments. Once we get those, if there are no changes, we would move forward with the bidding but we are waiting for them, at

Greenstein:  What's a reasonable turnaround time for County traffic to get back to

	Mr. Boyd:	I would expect that three weeks is reasonable and they exceeded that by		
about two weeks.  I	and the engineer from the designer's firm, started calling together and we		
finally received a response yesterday or maybe it was this morning.  They will have their review		
completed next week.  They committed to that, but they are running significantly slower than I		
would expect.							
	Mr. Greenstein:  That's reasonable.				
	Mr. Flint:  Regarding Items 3 and 4, some authority was delegated to Mark.	We were		
contacted by the consultant that has been hired by the Central Florida Expressway Authority.		
That is the new entity that's taking over for the prior entity that was looking at the expressway		
alignment.  We were contacted by their consultant.  They are meeting with the key stakeholders		
on both sides of the 1-4 interchange, including Reunion East, Reunion West, ChampionsGate,		
The Resort, Encore and the POA.  Those are most of the major players.  It's not a public input		
forum stage.  It's a stakeholder stage where they want to meet with different entities.  I've been		
working on setting that up.  Mark, on behalf of the Reunion East CDD Board, is going to be		
there.	I reached out to the Chairman of each Board.  The LRA also wants to be represented.		
Let Mark represent this Board.  John Chiste, as Chairman of Reunion West will be there, as well		
as, Daniel Baker on behalf of	the resort and LRA and David Berman on behalf of the POA.  We		
have a meeting set for the 21	st	•				
						
	Mr. Greenstein:  I believe it's the morning of the 22	nd			
		•			
	Mr. Harding:	Of which month?				
	Mr. Flint:  This month.  Because Daniel and Mark are going to be at that meeting, we		
are  going  to  coordinate  with  Daniel,  to  either  meet  before  or  after  that  meeting  on  the		
Management Services Agreement (MSA).  Now you have an update on the expressway issue.		
You also have an update on Items 3 and 4.				
	Mr. Dryburgh:  What are they still contemplating?				
	Mr. Flint:  There are two alignments that they are still looking at.  One goes right down		
Osceola/Polk and the other goes around and ties into 429.				

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 8

2017 of 14

Mr. Harding:  Way behind Carriage Pointe.	
Ms. Carpenter:  Does it make any sense for us to contact an eminent domain attorney to	
see if any input at this point would be helpful?  We obviously don't have anybody retained.  I	
think it is preliminary but they could help us with some arguments about why we put off one or	
the other and the cost.		
Mr. Harding:  I agree.	
Mr. Flint:  This is just the initial meeting.  They shelved all prior PD&E studies.  They	
are basically starting over because the prior entity that was doing it, no longer exists.  They have	
been absorbed into the Central Florida Expressway Authority.  They hired a new consultant.  I	
think it would probably be good for the District to be represented.  I'm sure that the LRA and	
others need to be represented by their own counsel, because there are potential impacts to CDD	
and LRA property.  We are not going to commit to anything at this initial meeting.	
Ms. Carpenter:	I will speak with an eminent domain attorney to see if he thinks it's	
something that would be appropriate, or if it is too early to get involved.	
Mr. Harding:  So the MSA discussion is going to be about what Liberty-Adler at the	
resort may want to do, as far as how they want to use these facilities and have an agreement,	
including the horse stables.	
Mr. Flint:  Correct.	
Mr. Harding:  I sent a note with regard to maybe a long-range plan to keep it in the back	
of our minds, if there's no agreement as far as them being involved.  Another study that I think	
we still should think about, is maybe having the horse stables and this facility from a meeting	
standard, be a landscaping facility and maybe not have us locked into the one that is out of our	
control right now and charges us quite a bit of money.  I think it winds up to be almost $16,000	
a month for all of the entities that are involved.  I think that might be something we can look at,	
depending on what happens with the MSA Agreement.	
Mr. Flint:  Okay.  We've talked about the gate.  It's going to be deferred at this point.	
Regarding the Excitement Drive gate, we have a date for the sign installation.  Andrew covered	
the shared cost.		
Mr. Dryburgh:	I noticed earlier, that we talked about signage at the Sinclair Road exit.	
Can we get some clarity?	
Mr. Flint:  That was one of Don's items.  Did we miss that?	

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 9

2017 of 14

Mr. Dryburgh:  We really didn't talk about Sinclair Road so I wanted to make sure that I	
knew where it was going.	
Mr. Flint:  That was Item 5A.	
Mr. Scheerer:	I talked with the County about putting a better sign up there, coming off	
of 429.  I believe that 429 is Sinclair Road, ifI'm not mistaken.  Is that correct?	
Mr. Harding:  Yes.	
Mr. Goldstein:  Have we approached the County on that?	
Mr. Scheerer:  No.	
Mr. Goldstein:  Is that something we can do?	
Mr.  Flint:	You are  not talking about a monument.   You are  talking about a  green	
directional sign.			
Mr. Dryburgh:  A large sign that says Reunion.	
Mr. Harding:  There's no indication that Reunion is there.	
Mr. Scheerer:	There's one small sign.	
Mr. Dryburgh:  Would it be nice to have a sign that says "Sinclair- Exit l".	
Mr. Boyd:  The challenge with Sinclair and 429 is it is a State right-of-way, and since	
the road is County right-of-way, there might be roads that are owned by the COD, so we would	
have to get a permit from the County to put up a sign in that location.	
Mr. Dryburgh:	We have two different locations, one is on Expressway 429.  We've seen	
others put signs up and that is a State issue.	
Mr. Boyd:	You would have to get the Expressway Authority to put up that sign.	
Mr. Harding:  Is that something we can initiate?	
Mr. Boyd:  We can make a request.  I've never done that before.  I have been successful	
in getting DOT to	put	up a similar location sign on a State highway.  The Expressway Authority	
is another entity.			
Mr. Dryburgh:	You know that it's amazing to me that they put all of those Palm trees	
up there.   They must have spent a fortune on those Palm trees.  They are all over the place.	
There must have been $100,000 in Palm trees but no watering system out there.	
Mr. Harding:	I don't know about that, but all I 'm saying is it seems like they could put	
up a sign that says "Reunion".	
Ms. Carpenter:  The intent right now is not put signs up.  I noticed on I-4 when they re-	
signed, they took some of the Celebration ones down.	

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 10

2017 of 14

Mr.

Dryburgh:  We are only asking for one sign.  We don't need 30, just one on each

side.			
Ms. Carpenter:  We can ask.	
Mr.	Flint:  We will ask.	
Mr.	Dryburgh:	You know what, its better asking and to get turned down, then to look	
stupid and never ask, so why don't we ask.	
Mr.	Grant:  That's fine.	
Mr.	Harding:	This whole thing,  as far as the  entrances,  came up in the last major	
member meeting with Carlton and all of the Encore people, talking about major signage at the	
front entrance here, and I don't know if anything is going to happen with that.  You guys have	
indicated that, along with the signalization issue, it is apparent that they could make a left turn	
coming into Reunion.  Then they also brought up the fact that on the west side, coming off of	
Sinclair Road, they have  a small sign there, after you make the turn,  that says Reunion is	
straight ahead, but there's no other indication.  People are bringing it to us saying, "Why don't	
we have something there as far as some sort of informational sign".	
Mr.	Flint:  Can you come up with the location on a map and then maybe Steve can talk	
to the County.		
Mr.	Scheerer:  For the existing sign?	
Mr.	Flint:  No.	We know where the existing one is, but we could see if there's a more	
appropriate location.  We're not talking about monuments.	
Mr.	Scheerer:  Some sort of directional sign?	
Mr.	Flint:  Yes, a directional sign.	
Mr.	Scheerer:  As you come out of Reunion, it would show the way to Reunion.	
Mr.	Flint:  Joe Dollard is the person to ask.	
Mr.	Boyd:  When the overpass was first built, we tried to get them to approve a mileage	
sign for Reunion on that bridge, like the one that shows how many miles to Orlando.  There	
would probably be the same thing there.	
Mr.	Scheerer:  They just wanted Palm trees.	
Mr.	Harding:  I think we can add that as an action item.  I forgot that we skipped that.	
We are still working on the allocation of costs.	

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 11

2017 of 14

Mr. Flint:  That was what		
	Andrew brought up.  Regarding the signage on CDD property,	
we received feedback,  both from  the resort and from  Encore, that they  removed what they	
believe are the offending signs.		
Mr. Scheerer:  Yes sir.		
Mr. Flint:  Alan was going to verify that.		
Mr. Scheerer:  La~t week we had six small signs, which I did not see today.  I didn't get	
through the entire resort today, but as of last week, all of the signs that were not allowed to be	
on CDD property were removed, with the exception of those six signs.  They are basically small	
open house signs.			
Mr. Flint:  I think they are gone.		
Mr. Scheerer:	I saw some in the traffic circle last week but those were gone today.	
Mr. Harding:  There are still a few up.		
Mr. Scheerer:	I will revisit that.  Security was tasked with removing the signs.  There	
were six last week and I will follow-up on that this week.		
Mr. Flint:  I'm communicating with Carlton and David Burman on replacement signage,	
consistent with our current official signage, so that we are consistent in style and with the policy	
that you adopted, that the signage be directional.  We need to make sure that everyone is on the	
same page with what a directional sign is, versus what a sign promoting a private interest might	
be.			
Mr. Harding:  Are we putting up new signs for the spa?		
Mr. Scheerer:  The two spa signs are still in place.		
Mr. Harding:	I don't remember them being very appropriate.		
Mr. Williams:	I will take a look at them.		
Mr.  Scheerer:   Just  to  re-clarify,  the  signs  that  we  are  talking  about  are  on  CDD	
property, not the signs that are located on non-CDD property .		
Mr. Harding:  Exactly.		
Mr. Flint:  We don't have any control over that.		
Mr. Scheerer:	You noticed the sign on Reunion Boulevard.	As long as it's not on our	
property, then that sign is exempt from our sign policy.		
Mr. Flint:  I agree.  I think we made some good progress.  We	are continuing to work on	
that issue.  Is there anything else that the Board wants on the action items list?	
Not hearing any,		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 12

2017 of 14

ii.

Approval

of

Check Register

there

Mr.	Flint:  You have the check register for the month of May totaling $176,697.  Are	
any questions on the check register?  If not, I would ask for a motion to approve it.	
	On MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded by Mr. Dryburgh, with all	
	in favor, the Check Register for the month of May was approved.	

iii.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement

Mr.

Flint:

You have the unaudited financial

statements through April

30th

•

iv.

Status

of

Direct Bill Assessments

Mr.	Flint:  We have some June payments due.	All of the May payments have been		
made, so it looks like we are in good shape.			
Mr.		st	payment from EHOF?		
	Greenstein:  Don't we have that one May 1			
Mr.	Flint:  Yes, you are right.			
Mr.	Greenstein:  We actually have two of them.			
Mr.	Harding:  What page was that on, Mark?			
Mr.	Greenstein:  It was on Page 14.  Wait a minute, I'm looking at the wrong page.		
Mr.	Flint:  We have one due from EHOF.  We will follow up with them.  They are pretty		
good re~ponding once we follow up with them.			
Mr.	Greenstein:  For whatever reason, it seems like there is a 45-day cycle involved but		
that's alright.				
Mr.	Harding:	We've spent about $4,700 on signage so far, this year.  What was that for?		
Mr.	Scheerer:	A lot of that is for repairs to the signs, stop signs and directional signs.  I		
just received a call the other day about a sign that was tapped by a construction vehicle, which		
is leaning.	We probably repaired three or four signs and we are in the process of updating the		
stop signs.					

Mr.	Harding:	Some of them are really	
Mr.	Scheerer:	Yes, especially in the	
have six more that I'm picking up and we will	

faded.

Homestead area.  We've

get those installed.

been replacing those.  I

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 13

2017 of 14

Mr. Greenstein:  Alan, there's one sign right at the intersection in The Villas.  There is a	
sign pole that became loose and tilted.  I don't know if it's because of the excess rain.	Do you	
know which one I'm talking about?		
Mr. Scheerer:  It's my understanding that we had it repaired on Tuesday.  The	one right	
next to The Villas?		
Mr. Greenstein:  Yes, as you are going to the first lined road on the left-hand side.	
Mr. Scheerer:  On Whisper Way.  That should've been repaired.  I had a contractor out	
here on Tuesday.  He called me and said that it was fixed.		
Mr. Greenstein:  I just noticed it a few days ago.		
Mr. Scheerer:  It should be done.		
Mr. Greenstein:  Thank you!		

v.

Presentation

of

JLAC Correspondence

Mr. Flint:  We received a letter dated March 20	th	from the Joint Legislative Auditing		
				
Committee, as a result of a finding in the prior audit.  This has to do with the bonds that are not		
currently assigned to any specific property.	We responded back in March of last year to the		
		th	indicating that no material change has		
same comment, and then we drafted a letter on May 30  ,			
taken place in that regard.	I don't expect them to take any further enforcement action.  They		
tend to be satisfied when we respond and they understand that there's no actual deteriorating		
financial condition and no need for the State to step in with financial assistance.  That's the		

main thing that they are concerned about.  Are there any questions on the JLAC letter?	
Mr. Greenstein:  No.		
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business	
There not being any, the next item as followed.	
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Request	
There not being any, the next item as followed.	
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date	

July

13, 2017.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 14

2017 of 14

On MOTION by Mr. Grant, seconded by Mr. favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Dryburgh,

with

all

in

Secretary/Assistant Secretary

Chairman/Vice

Chairman

en m -0~ z

<

LCAA/7

Central Florida Wiring

Jnc

.

909 Hillcrest Drive Davenport,

Phone: 321-594-1283 Fax: 863

FL 33897 -424-7114

Proposal Date:	April 28, 2017	
Project Nwnber:	17-2586		
Central Florida Wiring, lnc.'sproposal for	Premise	
For.			
Seven Eagles sound system repair		

Expiration Date:	May 28, 2017	

Distribution.

Scope

of

Work

Q	Provide and install (16) out door speaker at designated locations.		
Q	Provide and install out door rated 1612 speaker cable.		
Q	Provide and install (1) 1" PVC conduit with pull boxes for speaker cable install.		
Q	Terminate, Test and label all new cables.		
Clarifications		
Q	CFW. guarantees full compliance with, and adherence to all applicable ANSI/ TINEIA standards and within BICSI installation guidelines.	
Q	All applicable firewall penetrations will be sealed with an approved fire sealant		
Q	All work wm be performed during normal business hours, Monday-Friday 8:00 am to	5.00 pm., excluding weekends and holidays	
Q	Documentation and lest results will be provided upon completion.		
Q	All  CFW employees assigned to this project will be  certified installation lechnicians		
Q	All cable jackets are Riser (CMR) rated		
Q	Any additional work is not in lhe scope of work will be billed as, time & materials.		
Q	CFW will replace, will bear all expenses and labor costs for on-site repair		
	of any failure due to faulty workmanship for the period of one year.		
Q	Said repair will be done by, CFW personnel and will not be sub-contracted.		
Q	Response time will be within 8 hours if is possible, but in no case beyond Next Day/Best Effort (NOBE).	

System	$	9,954.78	
Tax	$	746	.61	
System Total	$	10,701	.39	

This proposal is intended to be accepted In its entirety. Divisions may cause pricing changes to occur.

Thank you for taking the time to review our proposal if please do not hesitate to contact me.

Separating line items and/or

you have any questions

Jerry Rivera

President

V,

m n -I 0 z

< .-

,,.

0

Reunion East and West CDDs Action Items

Item#

Meeting

Assigned

Action Item

Reunion East

Assigned

To:

Date Due	Status	Comments

1	3/14/11	

lrriqation Turnover

Developer

In Process  Awaiting TWA Response
Plans Submitted to

2	2/12/15

3	8/13/15

Research Signalization of Reunion

Entrance

Horse Stable Options Evaluation

Resident Use of Heritage Crossing

Boyd

Flint/Carpenter

In Process

On Hold

County. Awaiting Comments. Pending discussions with Resort re: MSA. Pending discussions

4	2/9/17	
5	2/9/17	
6	3/16/17	

Community Center

Improved Signage for Excitement

Drive Indicating Resident Only Gate

Allocation of 532 Costs

Flint

Flint

Scheerer/d'Adesky

On Hold	with Resort re: MSA.		
Completed			
In Process	Kesort & t::.ncore		

7	4/13/17	
8	6/8/17	

Siqnage on COD Property

Improved Siqnage for Reunion

Flint

Flint

Complete

In Process

Removed Signs by Deadline. Staff to verify

Compliance. Kesort to Present

Standard Designs and Proposed Locations at 7/13/17 Meeting.

	Meeting		Reunion West			
						
Item#	Assianed	Action Item	Assigned	To:		
		Research Signlalization of Reunion				
1	8/11/16	Entrance	Boyd			

Date Due

In

Status

Process

Comments Plans Submitted to

County. Awaiting Comments.

revised 7/6/2017

This

item

will

be provided under

separate

co

ver

This

item

will

be

provided under

separate cover

Reunion

East/West

COD

Direct

Billed

Assessments

f

or

FY

2017

District

Reunion

East

ILandownder	Product		

TotalO& M	Total Debt	Total Due	

O&M	Debt	Total	Paid

Citicommunities

11-1-15 DS Interest

34-25-27-4012-0001-0013   66 Comm

Estoppel

Totals

			Nov	
			Feb	
$10,982	$14,917	$25,899	May	
$10,982	$14,917	$25,899	Total	

$5.491 $2,746 $2,746

$10,982

$7,459 $3,729 $3,729

$14,917

$12,950 Paid 1/12/17	
$6,475	Paid 1/12/17	
$6.475	Paid 1/12/17	
$25,899		

LRA ORLANDO LLC

35-25-27-4885-PRCL-OC30   4 MF

EHOF

11· 1·15 Interest

27-25-27-2985-TRAC-FD20  30 Comm/755 MF

35-25-27-4895-PRCL-OlCO   242.29 Comm/701 MF/300 Hotel

27-25-27·2985-TRAC-FD30  10 Comm/56 MF/104 Hotel

$1,849	$5,054	$6,903	

$358,021	$152,465	$510,486	
$490,846	$1,201,848	$1,692,694	
$60,979	$354,517	$415,496	
$909,846	$1,708,830	$2,618,676	

Nov

Feb

May

Total

Oct

Nov

Feb

May

Total

O&M $925 $462 $462 $1,849

O&M $0 $454,923 $227,462 $227,462 $909,846

Debt $2,527 $1,264 $1,264 $5,054

Debt so

$854,415 $427,208 $427,208 $1,708,830

Total	Paid

$3,452 Paid 10/11/2016

$1,726 Paid 10/11/2016

$1,726 Paid 10/11/2016

$6,903

Total	Paid

so

$1,309,338 Paid 1/12/17

$654,669 Paid 3/15/17

$654,669 Paid 6/20/17

$2,618,676

District

Reunion West

ILandownder

Reunion West SPE

Total O & M	Total Debt	Total Due	O&M

Debt

Total	Paid

22-25-27-0000-0020-0000	90 Comm/120	MF	
35-25-27-4881-PRCL-0020	192 MF/-12	SF		
35-25-27-4881-TRAC·OG30	156 MF			
35-25-27-4881-PRCL-006A	15 Comm			
Reunion West HOA				
22-25-27-4923-0JOl-OOBO				
22-25-27-4923-0001-00MO				
Runion West Development Partners			
22-25-27 -4923-0001-00SO				
22-25-27-4923-0001-IJ0,'\/10				

$53,036 $51,857 $45,964 $2,946.00 $153,803.00

$167,262

$51,857

	$53,036	
	$51,857	
	$45,964	
	$2,946	
$0.00	$153,803.00	
so	$167,262	
$267,997	$319,854	

Dec

March

June

September

Total

Nov

Feb

May

Total

Nov

Feb

May

Total

$38.451 $38,451 $38,451 $38,451 $153,803

$83,631.00 $41,815.50 $41,815.50 $167,262.00

$25,928.50 $12,964.25 $12,964.25 $51,857.00

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$133,998.50 $66,999.25 $66,999.25 $267,997.00

$38,451	Paid		
$38,451	Paid 4/11/17	
$38,451			
$38,451			
$153,803			
$83,631.00	Paid 2/15/17	
$41,815.50	Paid 2/15/17	
$41,815.50	Paid	5/15/17	
$167,262.00			
$159,927.00	Paid	11/4/16	
$79,963.50	Paid	4/11/17	
$79,963.50	Paid	5/15/17	
$319,854.00			

Rwest Holdings

34-25-27-4012-0004-0010  1000 Hotel

				O&M	
			Dec	$37,518.50	
$150,D74	$0	$150,074	March	$37,518.50	
			June	$37,518.50	
			September	$37,518.50	
			Total	$150,074.00	

Debt $0.00

$0.00 so.oo

$0.00 $0.00

Total $37,518.50 $37,518.50 $37,518.50 $37,518.50 $150,074.00

Paid 1/20/17

Paid 4/11/17