MINUTES OF MEETING REUNION EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Regular Meeting

of

the  Board

of

Supervisors

of

the

Reunion

East Community

Development District was held on Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. at	the	
Community Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion, Florida.		
Present and constituting a quorum were:		
Carlton Grant	Chairman		
Mark Greenstein	Vice Chairman by phone	
Steven Goldstein	Assistant Treasurer		
John Dryburgh	Assistant Secretary		
Don Harding	Assistant Secretary		
Also present were:			
George Flint	District Manager		
Jan Carpenter	District Counsel		
Andrew d' Adesky	District Counsel		
Steve Boyd	District Engineer		
Alan Scheerer	Field Manager		
Garold Williams	Security		
Rob Stultz	Yellowstone Landscape	
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call		
Mr. Grant called the meeting	to order, and Mr. Flint called the roll.		
SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Public Comment Period	
There not being any, the next item as followed.		

Heritage Crossing

THIRD

ORDER OF

BUSINESS

Approval of the Minutes
2017 Meeting

of

the May 11,

Mr. Flint: Are there any additions, deletions, or corrections to those minutes? Not hearing any, we need a motion to approve.

On MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded by Mr. Dryburgh, with all in favor, the minutes of the May 11, 2017 meeting were approved.

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 2

2017 of 14

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Consideration	of	Work  Authorization	
from Boyd Civil Engineering for Work	
Related	to	the	Excitement   Drive	
Gatehouse				

Mr. Flint:  Next is the continuing saga of the	gatehouse on Excitement Drive.  We have		
								
your agreement, as well as the surveyor's	proposal.	I think where we left it was there were		
								
discussions with the County to see the						
			feasibility before we obligated ourselves to it.			
Mr.  Boyd:	I	approached the County but I	haven't received a response.	I don't see		
anything about the project that alerts the County to any problems, because they approved it as a		
non-gated access to begin with.						
Mr. Dryburgh:  What seems to be	cropping up, is that many of the residents in that area		
						
don't want it,  so	before  we go  too  far  down the path,  as I mentioned  at the  last meeting,		
shouldn't we be surveying the people who are going to be			
						impacted to see if they want to spend		
this kind of money on a project like this.  If you find that the majority of them want it, great.  If		
you find the		don't want it, why are we wasting our money on it?			
majority				
Mr. Harding:	This						
			morning, Alan and Garold and I met by the back gate with the sign		
guy that was making this large sign that's going to be comparable to other signs that we have.		
Garold talked about where he thought it would be the right place to put it.  We really think that		
						1			
might be the solution to the whole issue.  I believe on the l 6 \   they are coming in and installing		
the sign.									
Mr. Scheerer:  Yes sir.						
Mr. Harding:  Garold and I are going to be there.			
Mr. Scheerer:  And myself.						
Mr. Harding:  We are going to put up the sign.  I think you talked about even putting in		
some lighting.									
Mr. Scheerer:  Yeah, there's some electrical there.  There's actually enough light, a 120		
volt LED light that's in the location that the sign is going to go, so we can easily have our		
electrician come out and provide another LED light in front of the sign, once it's been installed,		
so that the sign is visible	throughout the evening hours, as well.			
						
Mr. Harding:	Correct me if I'm wrong, but Garold really believes that's going to be a		
				
major solution to the problem.						
Mr. Goldstein:	I'm having second	thoughts before it turns out to be a main gate.  I don't		
						
want all of that traffic coming through my street, quite honestly.			

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8, 2017

Page 3 of 14

Mr. Scheerer:  It won't increase traffic.					
Mr.	I hadn't really thought about that before and I'm the one who's pushing		
	Goldstein:			
it the hardest.  I think at this point, it makes sense to put a sign in and see what happens for a		
couple of months.  Let's table this for a couple	of months, before we spend the money.		
Mr.	Dryburgh:	I think just having a security car there really reduced the issue.		
				
Mr.	Harding:	I think the sign will probably eliminate the need for that.  I think Garold		
				
thinks that too.									
Mr.	Dryburgh:  The sign is located in such a fashion.  Is the sign going to be positioned		
			
early enough to stop a semi?							
Mr.	Scheerer:  Yes.  As you look at that location, which all homeowners are familiar		
			
with, there's an upfront median, split and the median after that for the gatehouse was being		
considered.  The front median just has one sign, with one pole.  The sign basically says that it's		
a divided road and to stay right.  That sign will go directly behind that.  Trust me, you can see it		
coming both ways on S.	Old Lake Wilson Road.  It won't be a problem.			
Mr.	Dryburgh:  So semi drivers would see it.				
					
Mr.	Scheerer:  The sign is over 6 feet	tall.				
						
Mr.	Dryburgh:  Perfect.  That's the largest sign.				
					
Mr.	Goldstein:	I prefer to table this until we see what happens.			
					
Mr.	Dryburgh:  Do we need a motion to table?				
					
Mr.	Flint:  I don't think so.							
Mr.	d' Adesky:	Not to table.  It's	a Board direction.			
Mr.	Greenstein:	I'm  hearing	what	everyone  is  saymg.	I  believe  Steve  just		

recommended tabling the issue for a few months based upon these actions that we are taking.  I		
totally agree with that.	I just want to remind	everyone, and I think I'm	right in saying this, that		
								
if the gatehouse goes up there, we have to inspect and	welcome all visitors.  That entrance was		
									
never anticipated, nor do I think that it would warrant having anybody other than residents into		
that gate.										

Mr. Harding:  We are all in agreement on

Mr. Greenstein:  Great.

Mr. Harding: I don't know if you heard can put some fairly simple lighting in there. Mr. Scheerer: Yes sir.

that right now and we will put the sign up.

that it can be lit at night.  Alan thinks that we

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

Mr. Greenstein:  Great, thank you.

June 8, 2017

Page 4 of 14

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	of  Proposed  Beautification		
				
	Projects	(Requested	by	Supervisor		
	Harding)					

A. B. C.

Larger Reunion Signage at Sinclair Road Exit and Rear Gate Entrance		
Stone Walls with Signage at Community Entrances		
Consideration  of  Request  to	Reunion  West  CDD  for  Installation	of	
Fountains in Heritage Preserve	Pond		

Mr. discussion.

Flint:	There were several items that Mr.

Harding

brought

up

and

emailed

me

for

Mr.	Harding:	Yes.	We had a major				
			property owner in here that wanted to put some		
more stone signs up.	I think they thought that maybe we needed them on the east side as well.		
Then they were talking about the Dowling Brothers.  They own something like 35 properties.		
They had a recommendation on the pond for fountains, way back when.  They want us to put		
these stone signs at various community entrances.  As it turns out, we have them on the east side		
at Carriage Pointe, Homestead, Liberty Bluff and Patriots		
					Landing.  Where we don't have them,		
from what I understand, is at Fairway Ridge North, Fairway Ridge South, Heritage Preserve and		
Legends Comer, which is on the west side.  The other thing that they were looking at, along		
with these signs, is also putting some fountains in the	Heritage Preserve pond, which is on the		
							
west side.	I got back to them after I looked into this more, and I had some conversations with		
Alan too.	If anything, it's	going to have to be a				
			Reunion West CDD Board decision.  From		
what I understand from Dowling Brothers, they want to come to the next Reunion West CDD		
meeting and make a presentation.  They are actually	offering to pay for some of this as well.		
						
We will have to allow the Reunion West CDD Board to discuss this and see what they want to		
do.							

Mr. Dryburgh:  Is there a sign like this for Heritage Crossing?

Mr.	Scheerer:  Yes.  Its right out front, when you turn in, on either side.		
			
Mr.  Harding:   That's not considered	a	community.	It's a condominium.		
						
condominiums are covered as well.					
Mr. Scheerer:  Yes.  Ever condominium and every single-family home on		
has a block sign with marble.					
Mr.	Harding:  Its only on the west side where they don't have stone signs.		

All of the

the east side

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 5

2017 of 14

Mr. Scheerer:  That is correct.					
Mr.			We are well covered on the east side, so we will let that be a west	side		
	Harding:				
project, including the fountains.					
Mr. Grant:  The only					
						comment I might add is, much like the sign discussion, there are		
standards to the existing signs; the marble insert, the logo and brick face.  I would recommend		
that we don't come	up	with a different standard, or let someone from the outside come	in	with		
their signs and it continues with the Reunion standard that we have established.					
Mr.	Greenstein:	You  are  absolutely  right,  Carlton.   Regarding  the  signage	at	the		
						
entrance to each	of the major communities, I think we					
						definitely have to touch base with Daniel		
Baker.  I did discuss this with him some time ago and we just need to resurrect it.  Hopefully		
now the time is right to have the west entrances be similar to the east entrances.					
Mr.	Harding:  Okay, because the LRA has to approve all of those kinds	of things.				
Mr.	Flint:	Not really.					
Mr.	Harding:		I	don't know.					
Mr.	Greenstein:		I think it was more of an issue of the developer putting	them on the	east		
							
side and they just weren't done on the west side.  We certainly need to review where we stand		
with how to move forward on that.					
Mr.	Harding:  Okay.					
Mr.	Flint:	That will probably be a west expense.  I don't see that as a shared expense		
because you have									
		monuments here; therefore, it would be a west issue.					
Mr.	Harding:	I will try to attend the next					
						Reunion West CDD meeting and bring it up, if		
they don't have it on	the agenda.  I don't know if you can put it on their agenda or not.				
Mr.	Flint:	I can ask the Chairman.					
Mr.	Dryburgh:		You can ask the					
						Chairman and see what they want to do.				
Mr.	Goldstein:		I think it's pretty simple.  If they want to put the signage in and pay for		
					
it, that's fine.										
Mr.	Flint:	Honestly, they are all public meetings.  At the beginning of	every meeting is		
a public comment section and that would be the best way for them to handle that.				
Mr.	Harding:  Okay, we will do it that way.  I've already given feedback.				
					
Ms.	Carpenter:	Is it all CDD land that the signs are on?					
							
Mr.	Harding:  Yes.					
Mr.	Flint:	I don't know.  We will have to look at where they would be.					

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 6

2017 of 14

Mr. Boyd:	It	
	depends on where they want to put them at.  They have to determine the	
locations first.		

Mr. their thing.

Harding:	They are reaching out to vendors and everything.

We

will let them

do

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.	Attorney

Staff Reports

Mr. Flint:  Next is Staff Reports.		
Mr.	d' Adesky: The only thing that I have to report is on the one action item.	We are	
trying to pin down the exact time to have a meeting with Osceola County.  We have been touch	
and go with them on the phone regarding the right-of-way.  People are on vacation and we are	
trying to make sure that everyone is		
		available at the same time.  We anticipate trying to get a	
meeting set next month with them to discuss those right-of-way costs.  That's something that	
I've discussed previously and you knew that it was coming.   Supervisor Harding is already	
delegated on that, so we really don't need to take any action at this time.  Just know that this is	
coming.				
Ms. Carpenter:	I ran into Dave Tomek at the County and talked it over with him.  He	
acknowledged that it is an issue that they should be open to, so really, it's just a matter	of being	
able to get time with them.		
Mr.	Flint:  They just cut a bunch of Oak trees down.  Did you see that?		
Mr.	Boyd:  Yes.  That is for their exit and deceleration lanes.		

B.

Engineer

There being none, the next item followed.

C.

District Manager's Report	
i.	Action Items List	

Mr. Flint: On the action item list is Water Management District and Toho on comments from the County before we go significant changes to the plans. Mr. Boyd: That is correct.

the irrigation turnover. The LRA that issue. On the signalization, through the bidding process, in

is dealing with the we are waiting on case there are any

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 7

2017 of 14

Mr. substantial this point. Mr. us?

Flint: We changes, we

Greenstein:

are waiting on County	comments.  Once we get those, if there are		
			
would move forward with the bidding but we are waiting for them,		
What's a reasonable turnaround time for County traffic to get back		

no at

to

Mr.	Boyd:	I would expect that three weeks is	reasonable and they exceeded that by		
									
about two weeks.	I and the engineer from the designer's firm, started calling together and we		
finally received a response yesterday or maybe it was this morning.  They will have their review		
completed next week.  They committed to that, but they are running significantly slower than I		
would expect.										
Mr.	Greenstein:  That's reasonable.						
Mr.	Flint:	Regarding Items 3 and 4, some authority was delegated to Mark.  We were		
contacted by the consultant that has been hired by the Central Florida Expressway Authority.		
That is the new entity that's taking over for the prior entity that was looking at the expressway		
alignment.  We were contacted by their consultant.  They are meeting with the key stakeholders		
on both sides of the I-4 interchange, including	Reunion East, Reunion West, ChampionsGate,		
								
The Resort, Encore and the POA.  Those are most of the major players.  It's not a public input		
forum stage.  It's a stakeholder stage where they want to meet with different entities.  I've been		
working on setting that up.  Mark, on behalf of the Reunion East CDD Board, is going to be		
there.  I reached out to the		Chairman of each Board.  The LRA also wants to be represented.		
						
Let Mark											
represent this Board.  John Chiste, as Chairman of			
								Reunion West will be there, as well		
as, Daniel Baker on behalf of	the resort and LRA and David Berman on behalf of the POA.	We		
have a meeting set for the 21	st	•						
								
Mr.	Greenstein:  I believe it's the morning of the 22	nd			
		•			
											
Mr.	Harding:  Of which month?						
Mr.	Flint:	This month.  Because Daniel and Mark are going to be at that meeting,	we		
are  going  to  coordinate  with  Daniel,  to  either  meet  before  or  after  that  meeting  on  the		
Management Services Agreement (MSA).  Now you have an update on the expressway issue.		
You also have an update on	Items 3 and 4.						
Mr.	Dryburgh:  What are they still contemplating?				
											
Mr.	Flint:  There are two alignments that they are still looking at.  One goes right down		
Osceola/Polk and the other goes around and ties into 429.				

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 8

2017 of 14

Mr. Harding:  Way behind Carriage Pointe.			
Ms.					
	Carpenter:  Does it make any sense for us to contact an eminent domain attorney to		
see if any input at this point would be helpful?  We obviously don't have anybody retained.  I		
think it is preliminary but they could help us with some			
			arguments about why we put off one or		
the other and the cost.					
Mr. Harding:  I agree.			
Mr. Flint:  This is just the initial meeting.  They shelved all prior PD&E studies.  They		
are basically starting over because the prior entity that was doing it, no longer exists.  They have		
been absorbed into the Central Florida Expressway Authority.  They hired a new consultant.  I		
think it would probably be good for the District to be			
			represented.  I'm sure that the LRA and		
others need to be represented by their own counsel, because there are potential impacts to CDD		
and LRA property.  We are not going to commit to anything at this initial meeting.		
Ms.	Carpenter:	I will speak with an eminent domain attorney to  see if he thinks it's		
				
something that would be	appropriate, or if it is too early to get involved.		
					
Mr. Harding:   So the MSA discussion is going to be about what Liberty-Adler at the		
resort may want to do, as far as how they want to use these facilities and have an agreement,		
including the horse stables.			
Mr. Flint:  Correct.			
Mr. Harding:  I sent a note with regard to maybe a long-range plan to keep it in the back		
of our minds, if there's no agreement as far as them being	involved.  Another study that I think		
						
we still should think about, is maybe having the horse stables and this facility from a meeting		
standard, be a					
	landscaping facility and maybe not have us locked into the one that is out of our		
control right now and charges us quite a bit of money.  I think it winds up to be almost $16,000		
a month for all of the entities that are			
			involved.  I think that might be something we can look at,		
depending on what happens with the MSA Agreement.			
Mr. Flint:  Okay.	We've talked about the gate.  It's going to be deferred at this point.		
Regarding the Excitement Drive gate, we have a date for the sign installation.  Andrew covered		
the shared cost.					
Mr. Dryburgh:	I	noticed earlier, that we talked about signage at the Sinclair Road exit.		
Can we get some clarity?				
Mr. Flint:  That was one of Don's items.  Did we miss that?		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 9

2017 of 14

Mr.	Dryburgh:  We really didn't talk about Sinclair Road so I wanted to make sure that I		
									
knew where it was going.					
Mr.	Flint:  That was Item 5A.					
Mr.	Scheerer:	I talked with the County about putting a better sign up there, coming off		
									
of 429.  I believe that 429 is Sinclair Road, ifl'm	not mistaken.  Is that correct?			
Mr.	Harding:  Yes.					
Mr.	Goldstein:  Have we approached the County on that?			
									
Mr.	Scheerer:  No.					
Mr.	Goldstein:  Is that something we can do?			
									
Mr.	Flint:	You are not talking about a	monument.   You are  talking about a green		
								
directional sign.								
Mr.	Dryburgh:  A large sign that says Reunion.			
									
Mr.	Harding:	There's no indication that Reunion is there.			
						
Mr.	Scheerer:  There's one small sign.					
Mr.	Dryburgh:  Would it be nice to have a sign that says "Sinclair -  Exit l ".			
									
Mr.	Boyd:	The	challenge with Sinclair and 429 is it is a State right-of-way, and since		
						
the road is County right-of-way, there might be roads that are owned by the CDD,	so we would		
have to get a permit from the County to put up a sign in that location.			
Mr.	Dryburgh:  We have two different		We've seen		
					locations, one is on Expressway 429.			
others put signs up and that is a State issue.					
Mr.	Boyd:  You would have to get the	Expressway Authority to put up that sign.		
							
Mr.	Harding:  Is that something we can initiate?			
									
Mr.	Boyd:  We can make a request.  I've never done that before.  I have been successful		
in getting DOT to	put up a similar location sign on a State			
						highway.  The Expressway Authority		
is another entity.								
Mr.	Dry burgh:  You know that it's amazing to me that they put all of those Palm trees		
up there.  They must have spent a fortune on those Palm trees.  They are all over the place.		
There must have been $100,000 in Palm trees but no watering system out there.			
Mr.	Harding:	I don't know about that, but all I'm saying is it seems like they could put		
									
up a sign that says "Reunion".					
Ms.	Carpenter:  The intent right now is not put signs up.  I noticed on 1-4 when they re-		
			
signed, they took some of the Celebration ones down.			

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June

Page

8, 10

2017 of 14

Mr. Dryburgh:  We are only asking for one sign.  We don't need

side.

30,

just

one on each

Ms. Carpenter:  We can ask.			
Mr. Flint:  We will ask.			
Mr.	Dryburgh:	You know what, its better asking and to get turned down, then to look	
stupid and never ask, so why don't we ask.			
Mr.	Grant:  That's fine.			
Mr.	Harding:	This whole  thing,  as far  as the entrances,  came  up		in the  last major	
member meeting with Carlton and all of the Encore people, talking about major signage at the	
front entrance here, and I don't know if anything is going to happen with that.  You guys have	
indicated that, along with the signalization issue, it is apparent that they could make a left turn	
coming into Reunion.  Then they also brought up the fact that on the west side, coming off of	
Sinclair Road,  they  have  a small  sign there,  after you make the turn,  that	says Reunion is	
straight ahead, but there's no other indication.  People are bringing it to us saying, "Why don't	
we have something there as far as some sort of informational sign".			
Mr.	Flint:  Can you come up with the location on a map and then maybe Steve can talk	
to the County.					
Mr. Scheerer:  For the existing sign?			
Mr.	Flint:  No.	We know where the existing one is, but we could see	if there's a more	
appropriate location.	We're not talking about monuments.			
Mr. Scheerer:  Some sort of directional sign?			
Mr. Flint:  Yes, a directional sign.			
Mr. Scheerer:  As you come out of Reunion, it would show the way to	Reunion.	
Mr. Flint:  Joe Dollard is the person to ask.			
Mr. Boyd:  When the overpass was first built, we tried to get them to	approve a mileage	
sign for Reunion on that bridge, like the one that shows how many miles to Orlando.  There	
would probably be the same thing there.			
Mr. Scheerer:  They just wanted Palm trees.			
Mr. Harding:	I think we can add that as an action item.  I forgot that	we skipped that.	
We are still working	on the allocation of costs.			

Reunion

Regular

East CDD

Meeting

June

Page

8, 11

2017 of 14

Mr. Flint:  That was what Andrew brought up.  Regarding the	signage on CDD property,		
we  received	feedback	both from  the  resort and  from  Encore	that	they  removed  what  they		
							
believe are the offending signs.						
Mr. Scheerer:  Yes sir.						
Mr. Flint:  Alan was going to verify that.					
Mr.			L~t week we had six small signs, which I	did not see today.  I didn't get		
	Scheerer:					
through the entire resort today, but as of last week, all of the signs that were not allowed to be		
on CDD property were removed, with the exception of those six signs.  They are basically small		
open house signs.									
Mr. Flint:  I think they are gone.						
Mr.		I saw some in the traffic circle last week but those were gone today.		
	Scheerer:			
Mr. Harding:  There are still a few up.					
Mr.	Scheerer:		I will revisit that.	Security was tasked with removing the signs.  There		
								
were six last week and	I will follow-up on	that this week.					
Mr.	Flint:  I'm	communicating with Carlton and David Burman on replacement signage,		
consistent with our current official signage, so that we are	consistent in sty le and with the policy		
									
that you adopted, that the signage be						
					directional.  We need to make sure that everyone is on the		
same page with what a directional sign is, versus what a sign promoting a private interest might		
be.											
Mr.	Harding:  Are we putting up new signs for the spa?				
					
Mr.	Scheerer:  The two spa signs are still in place.					
						
Mr.	Harding:	I	don't	remember them being very appropriate.			
								
Mr.	Williams:	I will take a look at them.					
							
Mr.	Scheerer:   Just  to  re-clarify,  the  signs  that  we  are  talking  about  are  on  CDD		
			
property, not the signs that are located on non-CDD property .				
Mr.	Harding:  Exactly.						
Mr.	Flint:  We don't have any control over that.					
Mr.	Scheerer:		You noticed the sign on Reunion Boulevard.	As long as it's not on our		
						
property, then that sign is exempt from our sign policy.					
Mr. Flint:  I agree.  I think we made some good progress.  We are continuing to work on		
that issue.  Is there anything else that the Board wants on the action items list?		
Not	hearing any,							

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,

Page 12

2017 of 14

ii.

Approval

of

Check Register

there

Mr.	Flint:	You have the check register for the month of May totaling $176,697 .	Are	
any questions on the check register?  If not, I would ask for a motion to approve it.		
	On MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded by Mr. Dryburgh, with all		
	in favor, the Check		
		Register for the month of May was approved.		

iii.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement

Mr. Flint:

You

have the unaudited financial

statements through April

30th

•

iv.

Status

of

Direct Bill Assessments

Mr.	Flint:	We	have some June payments due.	All of the May payments have been		
made, so it looks like we are in good shape.				
Mr.	Greenstein:		st				
		Don't we have that one May 1	payment from EHOF?			
						
Mr. Flint:	Yes,	you are right.				
Mr.	Greenstein:	We actually have two of them.				
						
Mr.	Harding:	What page was that on, Mark?				
						
Mr.	Greenstein:	It was on Page 14.  Wait a minute, I'm looking at the wrong page.			
					
Mr.	Flint:	We have one due from EHOF.  We will follow up with them.  They are pretty		
good									
responding once we follow up with them.				
I									
Mr.	Greenstein:	For	whatever reason, it seems like there is a 45-day cycle involved but		
							
that's alright.								
Mr.	Harding:	We've	spent about $4,700 on signage so far, this year.  What was that for?		
					
Mr.	Scheerer:	A lot of that is for repairs to the signs, stop signs and directional signs.	I		
					
just				other day about a sign that was tapped by a construction vehicle, which		
received a call the			
is leaning.	We probably					
				repaired three or four signs and we are in the process of updating the		
stop signs.									
Mr.	Harding:  Some of them are really faded.				
					
Mr.	Scheerer:	Yes, especially in the Homestead area.  We've been replacing those.	I		
have six more that I'm picking up and we will get those installed.			

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8, 2017

Page 13 of 14

Mr.			
	Greenstein:  Alan, there's one sign right at the intersection in The Villas.  There is a		
sign pole that became loose and tilted.  I don't know if it's because of the excess rain.  Do you		
know which one I'm	talking about?		
Mr.	Scheerer:	It's my		
		understanding that we had it repaired on Tuesday.  The one right		
next to The Villas?			
Mr.	Greenstein:  Yes, as you are going to the first lined road on the left-hand side.		
			
Mr.	Scheerer:  On Whisper Way.  That should've been repaired.  I had a contractor out		
			
here on		called me and said that it was fixed.		
Tuesday.  He			
Mr.	Greenstein:  I just noticed it a few days ago.		
			
Mr.	Scheerer:	It should be done.		
Mr.	Greenstein:  Thank you!		

v.

Presentation

of

JLAC Correspondence

Mr. Flint:  We				th		
	received a letter dated March 20   from the Joint Legislative Auditing		
			
Committee, as a result	of a finding in the prior audit.  This has to do with the bonds that are not		
currently assigned to any specific property.  We				
		responded back in March of last year to the		
same		th	,			
						
comment, and then we drafted a letter on May 30		indicating that no material change has		
						
taken place in that regard.  I don't expect them to take any further enforcement action.  They		
tend to be satisfied when we respond and they understand that there's no actual deteriorating		
financial condition and no need for the State to step in with financial assistance.  That's the		
main thing that they are concerned about.  Are there any questions on the JLAC letter?		
Mr. Greenstein:  No.					
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business		
There not being any, the next item as followed.				
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Request		
There not being any, the next item as followed.				
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date		

July

13, 2017.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

June 8,	2017	
Page 14	of 14	

On MOTION by Mr. Grant, seconded by Mr. favor, the meeting was adjourned.

Dryburgh,

with

all in

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman	
	-