MINUTES

OF

MEETING

REUNION

EAST

COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

DISTRICT

The  regular  meeting

of

the

Board

of

Supervisors

of

the

Reunion

East

Community

Development District was held Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 1 :00 p.m. at the Heritage Crossing

Community Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Carlton Grant	Chairman

Mark Greenstein	Vice Chairman

Steven Goldstein	Assistant Treasurer

Don Harding	Assistant Secretary

John Dryburgh	Assistant Secretary

Also present were:

George Flint	District Manager

Andrew d' Adesky	District Counsel

Steve Boyd	District Engineer

Alan Scheerer	Operations Manager

Mark Yahn	SunScape Landscape Consulting

Rob Stultz	Yellowstone Landscape

Daniel Baker	ACP Communities by telephone

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call

Mr. Flint called the meeting to

order

and

called the roll.

SECOND

ORDER

OF BUSINESS

Public Comment Period

Mr. Bissoon:  7474 Excitement Drive,

Unit

302.	We want to

know

when

the Terraces

pool is going to

convert to

gas so

we

can

heat

that

pool.

Mr. Scheerer:

As

the

Board recalls

you

entered into

an

easement agreement with Teco,

the one got

problem we had and are still fighting is the ownership issue that may be clarified by now. of the parcels that Teco did not get the easement agreement from the property owner, so it from the Condo Association and from the CDD but the landowner did not respond with

On we his

easement  agreement.   Right  now,

we

don't

have  any

of

the  easement  agreements  that  are

February 8, 2018							Reunion East COD		
										
necessary to convert to natural gas and Teco is now telling me that we may need to start the		
·process over.  We heat the pool during the all the holiday seasons, spring break, Christmas, New		
Year, Thanksgiving  and we  have  done that with propane gas but it is  not  cost effective to		
continue to use propane as the primary heat source.	I am working with Teco and Karen Byron at		
the Terraces Condo					of the documents			
	Association to try to get the rest		cleared up.  Once they are		
										
cleared up we will bring that back to the Board at a future meeting for review and approval.		
Resident: The problem with just a little heat in the wintertime, it is not useable.		
Mr. Scheerer:  We have						
				another pool right down from The Terraces that is heated.		
Resident:  Yes, but not for swimming laps.					
Mr.									
	Scheerer:  We will look into doing that.					
Resident:  I have been swimming laps at 7:00 a.m. and there is no one there.		
Resident:  The hot tub is not working.						
Mr.	Scheerer:  The hot tub is working.  We maintain those pools twice a day, somebody		
			
is there first thing  in the morning, they clean and then go back in the afternoon and check		
everything again.  I know the hot tub was working this morning.			
Resident:  Your guys may have been there but there was no drinking water.		
Mr.	Scheerer:	I will give you my card and any	concerns with that pool you can relay		

directly to	me.  The drinking	fountains as you know are in a duplex receptacle, they are GFI		
						
protected and if there is a	power surge or something like that it is going to trip the GFI and that is		
					
not going to allow the fountain to work.  It is a	simple fix and we can take care of it right away.		
							
Mr.	Flint:  As far as the easement goes I will be involved also and see if I can help with		
whoever the property owner is and						
				maybe we can get that moving.			

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS

Approval of the Minutes

2018 Meeting

of

the January 11,

On MOTION by Mr. favor the minutes of as presented.

Harding	Mr. Dryburgh with all in		
seconded by			
the January 11, 2018 meeting were approved		

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Presentation  from	Reunion  Resort	&  Club		
	Regarding					
		MSA  and  Addition	of	Heritage		
	Crossing  Community  Center  and   Horse		
	Stables						

2

February

8,

2018

Reunion

East

CDD

Mr. Flint:  Next is an issue that has been on the action items list and that is information		
from the Resort regarding a proposal to modify the management services agreement addressing		
the horse stables and Daniel Baker is on the phone and he has been working with Carlton.		
Mr. Baker:  Our intent was to provide you a written outline for the two facilities and I		
didn't forward that before this	meeting, but I will lay out the concept and if it sounds  like		
							
something the Board will entertain then we can put it in writing.  As I mentioned at the last		
meeting the club looked into how to maximize the	facilities and keeping the goal of the COD to		
										
keep it open for general use.  We came up with a structure where the club would manage those		
two  facilities	including  events,	collection  of fees,  as  well  as  coordinating  with  the  CDD		
							
regarding		it	being  reserved  for  CDD	functions  and  doing  that  we  will  take  care  of the		
									
administration of	calendars, the facility,  locking  doors.   We would accept all the  users  and		
						
schedule events at the facilities at each amenity and in looking at the market, the maintenance fee		
would be on the order of $400 per four-hour event.  In doing that, the club would collect the fees		
from the users and pass that along to the CDD for	revenue.  That user based fee because of the		
										
market as commodity, we would look at that on an annual basis based on the market.  The club		
would be	responsible for the routine maintenance	of the	facilities, help keep it clean and the		

CDD will be										
		responsible as it is, whether we're					
							involved or not.  The other costs of the facility		
would include capital expenses which would be needed to bring the facility up to hospitality		
standards.   We  would  look at  an agreement  similar to  Seven Eagles  that would  detail  the		
obligations and sharing of revenue for a three-year term with auto renewals.		
Mr.	Goldstein:  Do you have an	anticipated cost for upgrading the ho~pitality kitchen?		
								
Mr.	Baker:	I think Carlton would be in a better position to answer.		
Mr.	Grant:	I think you hit the nail on the head.  We are sitting at Heritage Crossing now		
and the carpeting is still in good condition, it needs a good cleaning but there are some things		
such as the walls that have pretty bad dings and scuffs and	scratches, painting that needs to be		
												
touched up.  I think the Heritage Crossing Facility is somewhere in the $5,000 range to get some		
of the things done.	It depends on the	condition in the other areas returned from Encore.  The		
								
stables facility really needs a good pressure washing.  From a structural standpoint, I recommend		
adding some large ceiling fans  up in the rafters that would provide some air circulation for		
events.  There is lighting, the restrooms are in good condition, it is sprinkled so it really is almost		

3

February 8, 2018

Reunion East CDD

about ready to utilize.  Again, I think an order of		
	magnitude number is roughly $5,000 going into		
each facility from a capital	standpoint and we can break that down and let the Board review it.		
			
Mr.			
Goldstein:  That is a lot less than I thought.		
Mr. Flint:  We are getting pricing now for the stables.  There is some painting and some		
work that needs to be done.  You have stained woodwork on the ceiling and things like that need		
to be addressed.			

Mr.				
	Harding:  What sort of events would you put at the horse stables?			
Mr.	Grant:  Right now that is	probably the hottest venue for weddings.	I brought our		
					
group  sales  team  over  there  and  our  catering  sales  team  and  our  destination  management		
company that themes our events that we host in the club and they literally said, wow, this is		
going to be very attractive, very popular.			
Mr.	Harding:  I assume you could get a pretty fair rate for renting out that facility along		
			
with the commercial kitchen and the other activity where alcohol is served.  What is the sharing		
on that sort of revenue?				
Mr.	Grant:  As Daniel was proposing the concept would be to charge a site fee whether it		
is a wedding, family reunion, event from the club or a CDD resident who would like to host an		
event there then that fee whether it is a $400 for four-hour increment, roughly $100 per hour,		
based on market pricing, all of that would go to the CDD.			
Mr. Flint:  Is there no contemplated compensation under the MSA to the resort based on		
the fact that you now have use of that facility to handle the special events?  Is that the in-kind?		
Mr.	d' Adesky:  The issue is going to come up at some point because once again this is		
going to have to be				
	reviewed.  First of all we are going to need something in writing, second that		
will have to pass that muster but I'm okay with the concept as laid out.			
Mr. Flint:  Right now in the MSA there is no cost to the District.  We have to work		
through the issues because there is still landscape maintenance, utilities, janitorial and all those		
types of things.  We need to make provisions for residents to be able to use it at no cost for social		
clubs and yoga and those sorts of things.  You don't want to tell the younger people they have to		
pay $400 to hold a yoga class.  We need a			
		provision for the sort of resident event use separate		
from the concept of someone who is going to hold a	I think $400 is		
		wedding or family reunion.			
low for a non-resident event but you might want to give residents a break.			

4

February

8,

2018

Reunion East CDD

Mr. Grant:  That is great		
		feedback.  I think that is enough for Daniel and me to be able to		
put				
something in writing and we will submit it to George for the Board review.  If we can get		
that done at the next meeting maybe we can designate one of the supervisors to review it.		
Mr. Greenstein:  I appreciate the revenue		
		recognition aspect of the proposal.  At the same		
time, I think the more we can align it with the current MSA for simplicity's sake, which ties into		
all the O&M related issues that George mentioned would		
		probably be a benefit to all parties.  We		
need to identify and segregate non-resident use from resident use and have resort use.		
Mr.	Grant:	If those are important components it may be an offsetting of expenses first		
prior to being a revenue generation.		
Mr.	Harding:  The other thing is to make it beneficial to the CDD, the resort and to the		
			
residents, all three parties.		
Mr.	Greenstein:  I think we are moving in the right direction.		
			
Mr.	Harding:  Do you think we can have something by next month?		
			
Mr. Grant:	I think Daniel and I can probably get something on paper for the Board to		
review before that.   Our goal would be to get something to George and we  can designate a		
supervisor to take a look at it prior to the next meeting.		
Mr.	d' Adesky:  Get it to me first because it needs to be vetted before we have any Board		
signoff.  If	you get it to us before the next		
		meeting, we might be ready by the next meeting to say		
it is vetted.				

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Discussion of Addition

at Highway 532

of

Landscape

&

Sod

Mr. Flint:  We have Mark Yahn here and he has looked at the median on 532 and we tried		
over time to reduce the  District's investment in the	maintenance of that area and focus  our		
					
attention more on the entranceways and the internal community landscaping.  We have talked		
and the County seems					
	amenable to some sort of offset on maintenance expenses for 532, it is the		
entranceway to the community.  We have asked Mark to work with Yellowstone to put together		
a						
proposal to try to clean up 532 and that involves shrinking some of the beds, installing some		
additional sod,	replacing some	of the existing landscape	material.  Mark and Yellowstone are		

here to present the proposal and we are looking for Board discussion at this point.		

5

February 8, 2018

Reunion East CDD

	Mr.	Stultz:	Mark Yahn is our associate that bas been Jooking out		for the CDD grounds		
since the onset of	our services agreement.  As we worked through a	number of projects this 532		
has	continued to come  up because	of maintenance related  issues.	We	agreed  to not put any		
						
mulch out	there last year because of the	uncertainty	of where we were  going.   We have been		
unhappy with its appearance and the fact	of it is without the mulch, mulch	is great for aesthetics		
but	jt is a	great medium to  hold	the herbicides that we put out that	suppresses	weed  growth.		
Without muJcb we are really taking a big tool away from	Yellowstone to		do that.		We decided		
																	
we	didn't	want to go into this year with the same sort of handicap.		We		had a		lot	of diseased		
holly trees and we	removed them and a lot of the beds they were in don t need	to	be	landscaped		
									
again  they can be sodded over.	We started looking at before we	put	out	mulch, which isn't		
inexpensive in itself  to look at trying to close in some of	these areas	some	are left irregular so		
we	thought	if we	went	out  and  sodded  those  voids  and		concentrated  on  our  roads  at  the		

intersections and entrances into the																	contouring bed		
						community and at least arrive at some sort of			
line and if	we didn't want to put plants in right now we could mulch	and	would	at	least end up		
with nice lawns and then some																							
					sculpted beds, some of them have decent plantings in them now		
some don't.	We tried to	remove	the plants that were not making a contribution.	I don t think		
Yellowstone's proposal has any new	plantings.  We are just trying to	clean		it up, make irrigation		
adjustments so we could grow grass and have vacant areas	mulched and	we would apply pre-		
															
emergent and post-emergent herbicides to keep it looking presentable.												
	Right now we are	discussing hard wood tree pruning for next faU		as we work through		
									
Reunion that is about one	of the only areas that is left and a lot of	them are hanging down very		
low, we are not getting good air									in a	lot	of	different ways.  I think		
					circulation.  We looked at 532						
this is the fourth and final rendition of our proposal before we	sent	it to Alan and we found it to		
be the most	complete yet most efficient way to take that problem and	get	it	under	control where		
it can be maintained in a presentable fashion until you can decide further	if	these beds are going		
to be left vacant or	someday be planted or	sod more of them and plant less.		The	turf	estimates to		
do them all were out of sight so	we	allowed enough	turf	to give some design		'				
										and layout to it		
because the whole green and brown	appearance isn't	so bad and there are still some plantings		
that look decent and those that do not will be out.  I	think it	would	be a huge	step in the right		
direction and it is still a big number	but it is	a huge area.	When you look	at the square footage		
out there it	is enormous.  When you come	off	ofl-4 and start up 532 there	is	one	big slope on the		

6

February

8,

2018

Reunion East CDD

right we thought it was Bahia grass, it is not it is Zoysia but it constantly sluffs	off in the road		
and looks very bad.  The only way we can control that erosion is to sod it	and in	some cases the		
Zoysia thinned out because the trees are so thick they don't get any filtered sunlight for the turf		
anymore.		I think it will be okay until we get around to the trees.	Our	thought for 532 was		
simply to expand the sod, sod over beds that have no plans of being replanted in the future,		
eventually trim the trees, put mulch in those beds with no	plantings and	sit	on it.	I think it takes		
															
us from undesirable to pleasant but it is still temporary					of	those beds will either		
									eventually some				
receive plants  or receive  more  sod but the  balance would make	a  lot  more  sense and you		
wouldn't have all this	vacancy that is just dirt.   Rather than leaving	it alone we thought we		
							
should at least bring	something to you that would be an interim step and	that proposal is it.		
						
Mr.		Harding:  When does the County start paying their half?						
																		
Mr.		d' Adesky:		I	tried	to  warn  that		Osceola  speed  is  not  the  fastest  but  they  are		
											
processing it right now.	I	had a call with Dave a week ago and I	sent him a form Interlocal		
agreement.		I have been pushing him to get it to us and get it finalized before May because that is		
our budget cycle.																
Mr.		Harding:	I feel uncomfortable stepping up to a	$43,000 bill if we don't have them		

stepping in.	If the County is not going to step up and pay for it I don't want to pay for it.		
Mr.		d' Adesky:  They did reassure me and I understand we don't have it in writing and we		
don't have the money yet but I anticipate we are going to get it in the next couple months.		
Mr.		Harding:  To his point, any future	renovations	of the property, if they are going to		

share the normal costs, they ought to share any kind of renovations as well.  When you talk to the		
homeowners and you talk about	how much in relative terms it is not a lot of money overall		
included in the CDD but when you talk to the	homeowners about how the County is going to		
											
split the cost they say how much was it and they say we are paying for all of that and how did we		
wind up with that and how can we get out of it.		In the interest of all the homeowners I think we		
ought to be careful what we do to	renovate that thing at the CDD's cost.					
												
Mr.		Goldstein:  We are looking at $32,500 for Zoysia sod.  What would it cost to mulch		
																		
that area?																		
Mr.		Stultz:	It would probably cost $10,000 then	annually  1" to  maintain it you are		
													
looking somewhere around $7,000.											
Mr.	Dryburgh:  What does it cost to mow the grass?								

7

February 8, 2018														Reunion East CDD		
																	
Mr. Stultz:  It is going to stay the same.	Remember the mulch is a recurring cost.  Those		
												
same questions come up in a lot of	communities and we are challenged to keep the grounds		
								
presentable and when we look at something like that it is difficult to maintain and difficult to		
keep it at that level.  532 is challenging and unless we do	something, we	don't want to make		
																	
excuses but they spend so much time dealing with a	problem like that and	you can't keep them		
															
focused on horticulture practice this thing is really going to make a difference.		
Mr.	Greenstein:	There is	background to this.  You said you went through three or four		
							
iterations before you came up with this.	I think it would benefit the Board if you would explain		
to us what the cost would have been		if	you	replaced the plants.  You are pulling out diseased		
											
plants and if money was not a problem you would	probably propose to replace the plant material.		
													
Mr.	Stultz:  We	did that if	you will remember, part of our original presentation when we		
did an upfront assessment of the CDD property we gave general assessments for each area and		
we have gone back and refined those more									
								precisely as we have done Reunion Boulevard, Linear		
Park and so forth.  I don't have those numbers in front of me but it was upwards of $182,000 to		
plant those islands.  Just the	exercise		of going at it and trying to figure  out the cost and that		
								
didn't include the large trees either that was just ground planting all three sides of the road was in		
that general neighborhood.														
Mr.	Greenstein:	I know it was		substantial, it was a six-figure number and it was a shock		
									
to the system.	We took an alternative	approach to try to get the O&M for this area down to a		
									
more manageable figure.  What you are basically saying now, because it does stick out and it		
sounds like a lot of money for sod but you are saying by having the area sodded it should reduce		
our O&M cost	for that area moving forward.		Is that a true statement?  Is	there any offsetting		
savings?																	
Mr.	Harding:  Will the $170,000 wind up being reduced in the future because we are		
																	
simplifying it and doing this kind of work now?								
Mr.	Stultz:  Yes, because a lot of	the beds that we	were anticipating to replant we sodded		
and quite frankly there is not a whole lot to be lost there.	I thought the plantings in the beginning		
probably from the developer were a bit excessive for a main			
														thoroughfare like that and a lot of		
the beds being removed and sodded over is a good move.  We are trying to keep in mind future		
planting so	as the sod we put down today wouldn't have to be disturbed.  The shape of the bed		

8

February

8,

2018

Reunion East CDD

line at the intersections would be established.  The irrigation	would be set in mulch so all you		
														
have to	do	is pull back the mulch or wait until you							
										need to plant and the mulching is done.		
	Mr.														
			Harding:  So, there would be a	payback is what you are saying.		
									
	Mr.	Stultz:  There												
					wouldn't be any redundancy, we are	putting in sod where we think it		
															
would always be we are just not suggesting	plantings right now.	If	you decide to plant later we		
												
have	established a lawn, you just replace some of the bare mulch with new plants or in some		
			
cases where partial plantings are okay you would simply add to it and leave the existing.  In		
many cases the existing plantings are okay and in some cases they are going to be completely		
gone and in some beds will be fully populated.	It is kind of a	mixed bag.  We concentrated more		
													
on replacing the lawns and establishing future planting areas that for now it will just be mulch.		
Later it can receive plants without going back and redoing the turf.   The Zoysia will all be		
secured.																
	Mr.	Dryburgh:	One	of the considerations we have to keep in mind is the expansion of		
Poinciana Expressway.  They are down to two options and one option is expanding it onto 532		
and at that point they are	looking at things 100 feet either to the north of the street or to the south		
							
of the street they will be taking over if they	decide to go the 532 route.  Planting more plants		
											
until they make that decision											
						makes no sense.  The lowest							
										maintenance you can put in until they		
make that decision and they say it is a seven-year legal process.						
	Mr.	Greenstein:	I don't think that is anything that is going to	happen tomorrow but from		

a financial standpoint you went through an analysis you							
										decided this made the most sense v.ersus		
replanting.  We need to know what the alternative costs are.  Is the alternative cost to replant in		
excess of this														
			number?  Is it less than this number and what is the	ongoing cost of maintaining it		
																
in the out years?  If there is no savings in the out years if it cost us			
														$170,000 a year to maintain		
that area and changing this is not going to change that $170,000 that is fine but we have to know		
what the	alternative cost is.	I would not do anything with this until we knew we had the County		
					
contributing.														

Mr.	Dryburgh:	It would be nice to	simplify the landscaping out there		

maintained and if we can accomplish that so	we are not	spending $170,000 a year		
						
great.						
Mr.	Greenstein:	I was hoping that you would say with less plant material		
				
10% even if it were a five-year payback on this expense.			

so it is easily that would be

we could save

9

February 8, 2018

Reunion East CDD

	Mr.	Dryburgh:	The choices are they either	put in more wood chips or	they put in the		
							
grass, the grass pays for itself in four years.  Just the	difference	in	dropping the initial $10,000 in		
															
wood chips and $7,000 every year after that versus a one-time hit	of $32,000.				
	Mr.	Stultz:	That is the  low hanging  fruit  the  rest	of it  is  less  mulch  more  turf but		
depending on if that change was made and put in place and there is time to do a RFP when these		
guys do their measurements they	measure for the acres and	man hours and get their number.		
										
That	calculation is	more labor intensive than mowing the grass.  When you are talking about a		
				
property this size and changing out 30,000 feet of	grass it probably isn't	going to	have a material		
effect.  It could be the difference in the way that one	contractor would	mow it.	It is cheaper to		
															
mow grass in beds, the big savings is the mulch.												
	Mr.	Greenstein:	I don't want to beat this to death.  From a budget standpoint do we have		
					
money in the budget for this expenditure for	landscaping without the County contributing? I'm		
										
assuming with the County's	contribution we should have a surplus.					
											
	Mr.	Flint:	We	have  $125,000  total  between  both	Districts'	budgets	for  landscape		
																
improvements.																		
	Mr.	Scheerer:  Most of that has been spent.												
														
	Mr.	Flint:	This  $40,000  is  not  a  budgeted  landscape		item	but  if you  look	at  the		
replacement and maintenance after we spend the	$270,000 we have budgeted this year	we are		
												
still going to have $3 million in that replacement and maintenance fund.  You are projecting a		
carry forward in	the next year after you spend this $270,000 this year, $3 million so $40,000 out		
of $3	million so	you have the money to do it, it is just	a matter	if	you feel the timing is right and		
that is a priority.	We could have just as easily brought forward a landscape improvement budget		
of$165,000 instead of $125,000 and it wouldn't have	been an issue from a budget perspective it		
was just that, which was	not one of the items that was on that list.							
	Mr.	Dryburgh:  If we	come forward with the $160,000	and	we have half being covered by		
							
Osceola  then  they	are	covering	half of this,  if	we	do  it	piecemeal	and  say	we  have  this		
													
maintenance of $40,000 they are going to say not their problem	it	is not part of the maintenance.		
	Mr.	Flint:  If they agree and we get this agreement signed they are going to pay roughly		
$80,000.																			

Mr.	We have employed Mark Yahn as a		
Greenstein:			
recommendation and this is his recommendation.  Financially,		

consultant to the from what I hear

Board we can

to make do it, it

a is

10

February

8,

2018

Reunion East CDD

a question	of			I think we are very confident					
	timing.						
					that we are going to get the contribution from		
the County and I recommend we do it, approve the					
					recommendation to sod 532.		
	Mr. Greenstein moved to approve the proposal from Yellowstone in		
	the	amount of $43,333 to sod 532.						
								
Mr. Dry burgh:	I would like to hold off until we have heard from the County.  Are you		
thinking we will hear from the County by April?						
Mr.	d'			I told them that we need a signed agreement, we need the funds before		
	Adesky:			
May.										
Mr.	Dryburgh:  Is there a timing issue we should be	aware of on planting the grass?		

Mr.	Stultz:  The ideal						
				planting period is the fourth	quarter or first quarter.  It is not that		
									
you can't but in March and April you start getting hot and dry conditions and is not the best time.		
When you get into	summer it can be very good	if you get heavy	rainfall but then it is almost		

excessive.	To answer your						
				question I don't think it is the end of the world if you don't but it		
would be best to complete it in the first quarter and	beyond that	if you approved it we would		
									
probably slide it based on current weather conditions.  You are going to get the best value if it		
goes in and performs well.  We would be more sensitive to weather		
								conditions if we waited into		
the May time period.							

Mr. front door,

IMr. Dryburgh seconded the motion.

Goldstein: I think that the Board and the residents many times have said that is our why doesn't it look nice.

On

voice vote with all in favor motion passed.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.	Attorney

Staff Reports

There being none, the next item followed.

B.

Engineer

11

February 8,2018

Reunion East CDD

Mr. Boyd:  The contractors are in the middle of making submittal packages of materials		
being ordered.				
Mr. Harding:  Will there be a				
	Reunion Boulevard sign on the structure?		
Mr. Boyd:  Yes.				
Mr.				
	Harding:  Both sides traffic, so you will know this is Reunion Boulevard coming up.		
Mr. Boyd:  Yes.				
Mr.	Harding:  Can we also talk about the	entrance off of Old Lake Wilson that has a		

broken arm?				
Mr.	Scheerer:  I wasn't aware	of that.  The POA paid for that rapid arm but I will take		
				
care ofit.					

C.

Manager

i.

Action Items List

Mr.	Flint:	Daniel, is there any update on the Water Management District permit and		
				
irrigation turnover issue, the consumptive use permit?			
Mr.	Baker:  We are currently in a holding pattern.			
Mr.	Flint:  We have addressed the			
		signalization.  The 532 costs we have addressed.  The		
amendment to the MSA we have addressed.			
Mr.	Harding:  I have a couple other items.  Sinclair Road and 429 I think The Resort was		
			
going to come back with maybe a proposed ,sign that the County could look at as far	as this is		
Reunion.					

Mr.

Grant:	I think I committed to getting with Alan to drive around and I haven't done it	

yet.

Mr.

Mr.

Harding: We still have that on the plan, right? Grant: Right, I need to get with Alan to get out there and look at the physical

location.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Harding: Could we add that to the list? Flint: Yes, I got your email and we will add it. Harding: The other thing is the parking, no parking spaces at the mailbox. Scheerer: I approved that work and am just waiting to get a schedule.

12

February 8, 2018								Reunion East CDD		
												
	Mr. Flint:  The reason it dropped off is you have already approved the work to be done.		
If it is not done by the next meeting, we can put it back on.					
	Mr. Harding:  I would like to see items on there until they are complete.		
	Mr.				of the roads in Reunion, as you are driving down the road,		
		Dryburgh:  Some sections			
they will pouch in then pouch out.	I	have no idea why, I never thought I would ever see cars		
parked in the areas that are	pouched in so you can't get a car through the	center but this morning		
							
I									one	way and the other		
watched two guys almost get into fight over it because one was going				
and neither would pull over and they both stopped in the center of the road.  Common sense says		
it is probably illegal to park there but they do.  There is no		no coloring red on		
								signage; there is			
the side of	the road.  Have we looked at that, have we had problems with that in the past?		
	Mr.	Boyd:	It is a speed control element in sections of the road where	people might tend		
to start to increase speed.									
	Mr.	Dryburgh:  Do we need to think about putting some signs there that say no parking?		
				
	Mr.	Flint:	It is a violation	of	state statute	if you block emergency vehicle traffic even		
though there is a no parking sign there.							
	Mr.	Dryburgh:  I'm talking about some guy from another country who has no clue.		
	Mr.	Scheerer:  They actually appear to be bike lane markings on Gathering Drive, they go		
				
from Seven Eagles past Excitement to	Sparkling Court, there is a narrow	area there and then on		
									
Excitement  Drive  between  Titian  Court  and  the  roundabout  there  is  another  area  where  it		
narrows in and chokes down there.  There are no pavement	markings there, on	Gathering Drive it		
											
looks like it is marked and I would	consider it a bike lane but these are not parking stalls, these		
							
are not designated parking spaces.								
	Mr.	Dryburgh:  Can	we get it posted because I have noticed Yellowstone struggles to get		
					
through there.  If you are not supposed to park on that whole segment of that street then it should		
be	marked,	if it is just where the little pods are that should be marked	but	something to tell		
						
people where they	can and cannot legally park.						
	Mr.	Flint:	You could put	no	parking  signs there,  we don't have  the  legal ability to		
enforce that but we could ask Community Watch	Solutions to put notices on	the cars as a first		
										
step and if it becomes an issue then we	can look at other steps.  That is no cost	to us and it also is		
going to resolve the sign pollution.	I will add that to the action items list.				

13

February

8,

2018

Reunion East

CDD

ii.

Approval

of

Check Register

Mr. Flint:

The

next item is the approval

of

the

check register

for

the

month

of

January

totaling $457,375.32.

On MOTION by Mr. Greenstein seconded all in favor the check register was approved.

by

Mr.

Dryburgh

with

iii.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement

Mr. Flint: The balance sheet and income There is no Board action required.

statement are included

in

the agenda package.

iv.

Status

of

Direct Bill Assessments

A

copy

of

the direct bill assessment was included in the agenda package.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business	
There being none, the next item followed.	
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Requests	
There being none, the next item followed.	
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Meeting Date	
Mr. Flint:  The next meeting is March 8, 2018.	

14

February 8, 2018

Reunion East CDD

On MOTION by Mr. Harding in favor the meeting adjourned

seconded by at 2:02 p.m.

Mr.

Greenstein

with

all

Secretary/Assistant Secretary

~	d~ - t - lt

Chairman/Vice Chairman

15