MINUTES OF MEETING REUNION EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Regular	Meeting  of the  Board	of	Supervisors  of the		
					
Development District was held on Thursday, January  12, 2017 at		
Crossing Community Center, 7715 Heritage Crossing Way, Reunion,		
Present and constituting a quorum were:				
Carlton Grant			Chairman		
Mark Greenstein		Vice Chairman		
Steven Goldstein		Assistant Treasurer		
John Dryburgh		Assistant Secretary		
Don Harding			Assistant Secretary		
Also present were:					
George Flint			District Manager		
Andrew d' Adesky		District Counsel		
Steve Boyd			District Engineer		
Alan Scheerer			Field Manager		
FIRST			Roll Call		
ORDER OF BUSINESS				
Mr. Flint called the meeting to order, and roll call was taken.		

Reunion  East  Community

2:00 p.m.  at the  Heritage

Florida.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS

Public Comment Period

There not being any, the next item as followed.

THIRD

ORDER

OF

BUSINESS

Approval
December

of	the   Minutes
8, 2016 Meeting

of

the

	Mr.  Flint:   These  are	included  in  your  agenda  packet.		If there  are  any  deletions,		
						
additions, or corrections we can address those at this time.				
	Mr. Harding:  On page 9 the wording is weird.  On page	10	it should be Ms. Carpenter		
instead	of Mr. Carpenter and the sentence should read, " ... we can build into the budget", not		

built. On page 16 the comments were from Mr. Dryburgh not from Mr. Harding. Mr. Greenstein: On page 6 where it says Mr. Yahn, it should say Mr. Grant.

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 2

201 7 of 13

On MOTION by Mr. Greenstein, seconded by Mr. Harding, with		
all in favor, the	minutes	of the December 8,	2016 meeting were		
					
approved.					

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Discussion

of

Proposed Signage Policy

Mr.	Flint:  This was brought up about six months ago by Mr. Harding and I think we put		
it on hold so we are	bringing it back based on Mr.	Harding's request.		
						
Mr.	Harding:  The draft	proposal that is in the booklet that I handed out covers the items		
							
1 and 2 as far as no signage shall be placed on District	property except for signage installed with		
											
the written											
	authorization of the District.  This is						
						something that I think we need to have as part		
of policy.  Authorized personnel or an agent of	the District may remove any sign placed in		
violation of this provision immediately, which is also part of	the same proposal.  What I would		
like to add to the draft policy from my standpoint, would be all of the signs that are on District		
property should conform to a standard.  The attached picture, I think, is a very professional type		
sign that the Resort has used in a number of places, but then again there are a number of other		
signs that look of the lower value.  I think we need to set that	as a standard and have everybody		
comply to that as far as any signs on District property goes.	It doesn't necessarily have to do		
with the Resort or Encore I just think we need to have some standardization so it looks nice.		
I've  had  people  from  the  Resort  think  that the	signage  needs  to  be  cleaned  up  and  look		
									
professional.   The  second part	of that is I think the sign should be for . a purpose,  and that		
purpose is to provide direction.	I don't think the sign should be on CDD property for marketing		
purposes or advertisements, and I think that is something that we shouldn't allow.  As far as the		
signs  coming  in  on  the  post,  where  the  advertisement  is  talking  about,  the  holidays  and		
sometimes there are		golf		think those are fine and appropriate as far as letting		
				tournaments, I			
people know about events at the Club.							
Mr.											
	Greenstein:  They should use professional prepared banners.		
Mr.	Goldstein:  What about the employees parking sign?		
			
Mr.		Harding:	I  think	that  is	necessary  and  I  think  those  are  just  signs  placed		
								
periodically.											
Mr. Greenstein:  The notes that I had before you handed this out to the ordinance is from		
another  CDD  and  it  is  admin  procedures  needed,	guidelines  for  approval  of signage,  and		
										
permanent versus temporary because we have temporary situations.		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 3

2017 of 13

Mr. Harding:  That is a good point and for employee parking or whatever else.		
Mr.  Goldstein:   We  could  use  those  for  the  restaurants  too.   Maybe  some  special		
consideration could be made for the hotel signs for the employees or restaurants but standardize		
the way they look if that is what you are wanting.				
Mr.	Harding:	Yes, absolutely.  Some of the signs are just a board with a post and these		
kinds of signs I think are very									
				unprofessional and do not look good.		
Mr.	Goldstein:  Some of	the signs that are in place now are not managed and they are		
				
bent or broken.  The resort does use								
					professional printed signs even if it is for a Thanksgiving		
Buffet.  They are made by a graphic designer and are professionally printed.		
Mr.	Harding:  That is a temporary kind of sign.  If	it is a permanent type of sign I think it		
should be for purpose	of direction and it should set the right kind of standard.  The simple post		
in the ground with a plaque on it is not necessarily				
									consistent, so that is what I am proposing.		
Mr.  Greenstein:   Andrew, from a structural	standpoint do you think we can come up		
												
with the statutory language that allows us for separate administrative procedures or would it be		
okay to adopt and incorporate the	administrative procedure in the policy document?		
							
Mr.	d' Adesky:	I	guess what you are trying to say is, for example, there may be some		
things that are more of	an administrative	procedure that do not need to be formalized into a		
								
formal policy.  Is that where you are going with this?				
Mr.	Greenstein:	Yes, and that you	just have an	eye level authorization language and		
													
then a few guidelines that are administrative procedures that does not require us to continually		
change this document to do the administrative stuff at an operating level.		
Mr.	d' Adesky:	My concern is we		don't want to go down the hole of getting really		
specific and issuing very specific	guidelines for signage and posting.  I think general standard is		
							
always good and	I think like you said, it is a little bit easier if you do something with a broad		
authorization and then allow administrative	procedures from there to go and execute that and to		
									
narrow that down and look at the maintenance of the sign.			
Mr.	Harding:  This could be an example.				
													
Mr.	d' Adesky:	Yes,  it could be an	example,  but you don't want to  say that is the		
											
standard and then issue 50 exceptions to the		standard.  Does that make sense?  It is getting too		
											
specific and you are automatically contradicting yourself.			
Mr.	Flint:	Most CDD's do not get into  design	standards and regulating  community		
													
standards and appearance; it is an HOA and POA issue.  Ideally the Master Association would		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 4

2017 of 13

set the design standards and then the CDD would set the standard saying that signage should		
only be direction	signage and shall		be in conformance with the	standards that are set by the		

Master Association.   Then you have the  Master	Association kind	of regulating  the  design		
																				
standards		because that is what they	do and the only thing that we are regulating is	if there is		
							
going to be a sign it needs to be	directional and consistent with the Master Association's design		
													
standards.			If you can't base on who	is controlling the Master	Association and there are hurdles,		
																					
we might	be able to	do	something														
											different than that but in an ideal world that is how it would		
work.  I do have Districts that don't want	to	acknowledge that you are subject to those design		
																	
standards	because there may be	some instances where we	don't want the Master Association		
						
coming to			us as a Government Entity and telling us that we need to paint our building so we		
have to be	careful about that part.														
	Mr.	d'Adesky:	I think numbers 1,	2,	4 and largely number 5 maybe a little tweaking of		
the	language is where we want to be.	Number 3 is a big one and you want to think about that		

carefully and how you want to word that.  The wording that George proposed, which is all such		
signs shall		be in	conformance with the Master Association	standards but if you do	not control		

the Master		Association then you kind	of have to set some broader guidelines there.				
									
	Mr.	Harding:  Are there any														
											guidelines that the Master Association has?				
	Mr.	Greenstein:		There  are  guidelines  under  the  featured  builders  program.   For		
												
example, the signage on	property lines but	I'm not aware of any that would pertain	to	the CDD		
															
property.																								
	Mr.	Harding:		There is very		specific language in the HOA	talking about	as	property		

owners we are not	allowed to put any kind	of signs out in front of our property for sale signs or		
									
anything like that.  We are heavily regulated.											
	Mr.	Flint:		I	looked at them and there  doesn't seem to be any design standards for		
									
commercial property.																			
	Mr.		Dryburgh:	The original developer	installed the bulk of the signage that is in place		

throughout the community and any					those signs have been done by the Resort.  This		
											updates to			
sign here sits on Seven Eagles HOA property but it certainly is a sign that the Resort paid for to		
be updated.																						

Mr. quality first

d'Adesky:	If I was editing it,	I would say that	all	signage required shall	
rate signs which shall be				
	similar to and attach the picture.	

be

high

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 5

2017 of 13

Mr.	Harding:  The other part of that is any signage would have to be approved by the		
			
CDD anyway so there is some control there.							
Mr.	d' Adesky:	Right,  and  then  you  would  want	to  grandfather  in  some  of the		
community	information stuff, which we can do.  Would it be all right	if I fix this a little and		
				
bring it back next meeting?								
Mr.	Harding:  Yes.								
Mr.	d' Adesky: Okay, I'll bring it back next meeting.	If the Board is agreeable I may		
send a draft of what I fix to Mr. Harding so that you can look at it.			
Mr.	Greenstein:   We  are not going emphasize	prohibition of	signage  it is basically		

approval of signage.									
Mr.	d' Adesky:  Yes, approval of signage.					
Mr. Grant:  How are we going to handle the signs that are marketing?		
Mr.	Harding:  We are in	agreement I think that we don't have marketing signs.		
					
Mr.	Flint:  You can have a							
			directional sign to the Bears Den Development it just doesn't		
have to be green with a gold bear on it.							
Mr.	Harding:  We can't control the signs on their own property.			
				
Mr.  Grant:    Shouldn't  there  be  a	differentiation  between  permanent  signage  and		
temporary signage?  In the CDD, but in the	development in the Resort, whether it is a builder		
						
doing an open house,	a golf tournament,  or a	member event there is	going to be temporary		
								
signage.										
Mr.	d' Adesky:	I will add a clause in there					
					because that is something I wanted to fix on		
the flyer section.  I hear the Board's direction.						

FIFTH

ORDER

OF

BUSINESS

Discussion

of

Intersection Signalization

Mr. Boyd: This is a proposal that was discussed at our Reunion West CDD meeting to provide construction documents and permits through Osceola County to construct the signal at the entrance road and 532. Reunion West CDD approved this and the budget cost would be shared between Reunion East and West CDD. Mr. Flint: Once we have the design documents then we can bid it out and we will know a true number at that point but you cannot bid it without the design. Mr. Harding: We are going to check on what those other areas are going to cost. The

developer there

is

paying for

all

of

that, right?

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 6

2017 of 13

Mr. Boyd:  Right, the only thing that would be	public record is if they submitted the cost		
as part of their inspection fee determination, and if that is the case, then I should be able to get a		
copy of that.				
Mr.	Harding:  If there were	a number of unfortunate fatality accidents coming out of the		
					
Resort  there,  would  Osceola County  or  anybody  feel  obligated to  do  something about it?		
Coming down I-4 there were some fatalities and all of a sudden we saw lights being installed		
and I don't know how that took place.			
Mr.	Boyd:  The signals at 1-4 were a tri-party	agreement between Reunion East CDD,		
					
ChampionsGate,  and  Osceola  County.    Reunion  East  funded  the  cost  and  the  County		
contributed impact fee credits and	ChampionsGate ended up writing a check for a portion of		
				
that cost.					

Mr.	Harding:  It seems like for something like that to happen		
					
sad.					
Mr.	Greenstein:  It definitely was fast.		
Mr.	Boyd:	That signal	could've been in quicker but because		
					
FDOT was involved in the permitting process and there was a lot		
should be fairly simple because it is just Osceola County.		
On MOTION by Mr.  Greenstein, seconded by Mr. Harding,		
Intersection Signalization was approved.		

is what it takes and that is

of FDOT Right-Of-Way, more involvement. This

with all in favor,

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.	Attorney

Staff Reports

Mr.	d'Adesky:	LRA and Trustee's	Counsel are still engaged in ongoing negotiations		
					
and we still	do not advise to take any action until they sort it out.	Mike Eckert of the Trustee's		
Counsel is	supposed	to  send  a letter.   They had conversations	with each other so he was		
					
supposed to send them a letter and he hasn't done that yet.	I sent him an email today just to		
confirm and he said that he does plan on sending that shortly and asked that we do not take any		
action at this meeting.						

B.

Engineer

There being none, the next item as followed.

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 7

2017 of 13

C.

District Manager's Report	
i.	Action Items List	

Mr.	Flint:  The irrigation is in the hands of LRA and	the Water Management District at		
this point and	we	do not have a lot	of control over that.	We	keep it on here but it is not		
something that	we are actively involved	in.	The horse stables, I	talked with Kevin Moore	and		
he was the original design architect for all	of the buildings in Reunion.   They are	located in		
downtown Orlando at Butler Moore	Architects and Guy Butler is his partner.  They	do a lot of		
										
work for the Resorts and Disney so	I spoke with him	and	tentatively set a meeting for next		
															
Tuesday	morning	at  10:00	a.m.  here.	What I was	going	to	ask  the· Board	to  consider is		
										
designating a Board	member to attend that meeting with me	and be the liaison	from	the Board		
										
on this issue if the Board is amenable to that.	If 10:00 a.m. doesn't work we can change that.			
Mr.	Harding:	I will volunteer.												
Mr.	Flint:  Anything would have to come back	to	the Board first.					
Mr.	Greenstein:  Who will be in that meeting?									
											
Mr.	Flint:	It will be  me,  the  architect,  and	I	was	going  to  have  a	Board member		
designated and Alan will be there  as well.	He knows the situation about the horse stables		
building and I spoke with him about the Board's desire to							
												evaluate potential alternatives for use		
of the building.	I	would hope as much work as that firm does with Resort Communities that		
they would have some new experience and thoughts in that area.	It is not something that they		
are going to do	for	free but I think this initial meeting would be letting them know the issue that		
we have and I would expect a								of work and an associated	fee		
						proposal from him with the scope				
to come out of that meeting.  That would have to come to the Board for consideration but I think		
it is a start.  Alan is still working on getting proposals and we've had some problems getting		
some from contractors over the holidays.											
Mr.	Scheerer:	I actually had one Company call me Wednesday and withdraw.  They	are		
						
the people that were actually	contracted to install that pool and spa at Heritage Crossing and	he		
									
said that he is way too busy.	I did talk to Todd Thiessen at Thiessen Brothers, but he hasn't		
returned any of my	calls since after Christmas.  I did get a							
												gentleman from Blue Scape Pools out		
and he is still working on that proposal.	I	got one other							
												recommendation from Spies Pools,		
which is who we use here quite a bit for repairs and renovation work and I'm going to reach out		
to the Company they sent me today.		I will keep searching but I	was a little disappointed that		
Davenport Post called and said they aren't going to do	it.  We are not going to give up and I		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 8

2017 of 13

apologize for not having anything today but we will	If anyone has any other		
							continue to pursue.			
sources please let me know.								
	Mr.									
		Harding:  Do we know whether or not the things we talked about as far as the onsite		
signage for operational hours that were						
					supposed to be posted and also a posting of who to call?		
	Mr. Grant:  The hours of	operation are posted for the cafe, facility, and the fitness center.		
						
I will make sure the Management Company contact gets posted.				
	Mr. Greenstein:  After hours problems would be a Resort number.			
	Mr.	Scheerer:	I don't know	that there is any signage at the pools that reflect an after		
						
hours	emergency  contact.   There  is  an	emergency  phone  at  the  pool  that  connects  to  the		

monitoring service that we have	at every pool.  They call me because I	am	the personal contact		
on that  and  the  office  number  also  lists  my  number  at  the  end  of	the	voicemail  for  any		
emergencies.									
	Mr.	Harding:  So we do need to add a sign as far as that?				
						
	Mr.	Grant:  Yes, for the code							
				specifically related to the MSA I will have a plaque put up		
at the entry that									
		stipulates the Resort's phone number.				
	Mr.	Harding:  There are portions of the	building right now that Encore doesn't lease and		

I think it is this room for example.							
	Mr. Flint:  Right.								
	Mr.	Harding:  When Encore's lease is up at the end of this year, who is going to manage		
this facility because the Resort is no longer going to be involved?				
	Mr. Flint:  We will manage it from a maintenance and landscaping standpoint.		
	Mr. Harding:  Who will lock it up?						
	Mr. Flint:  Security locks it up.						
	Mr.	Harding:  Any of us can go into any of the pools because we are CDD property		
				
owners and the fact that this is a CDD any	of us				
							property owners should be able to come in here		
anytime right?									
	Mr. Flint:  It is	You	can regulate the hours of facilities like this.		
			different.				
	Mr. d' Adesky:  Like a public library that you are paying taxes for, but that doesn't mean		
that you can come in at 2:00 a.m.								
	Mr. Scheerer:  The building is open everyday.				
	Mr.	Harding:  Would they call	you	with any issues with the building?		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 9

201	7	
of 13	

Mr.	Scheerer:   The  residents  here  typically  call  Security  or  the  Engineer  and  the		
			
information gets conveyed.						
Mr.	Harding:  Should we have some sort of posting for that?			
				
Mr.	Greenstein:  You are assuming.	Probably within the next quarter we need to look at		
							
the future use of this building moving	forward, and that would include reaching out to LRA and		
						
to the community discussing among ourselves the best purpose for this building.  This building		
is a community center and I think it was a high value asset at one time and I think it could be a		
high value asset moving forward so I wouldn't assume anything yet.  We really need to focus on		
it because most people like this building and see use for this			
					building.  If we reach out we could		
get all kinds of recommendations.						
Mr.	Harding:  But do we need to do anything in the meantime for the part	of the facility		
				
that is not being utilized by Encore?						
Mr.	Grant:  Encore is still paying for it so they have a right to utilize it.			
Mr.	Harding:  The yoga people use it.				
Mr.	Grant:	It  is  an  independent  yoga  instructor that  is  doing  it  with	some  of the		
members.								
Mr.	Goldstein:   They have  a lot of	Resort people coming to yoga and they pay $10		
				
which goes to the instructor.						
Mr. Grant:	It is not a Resort event.				
Mr. Flint:	We have the ability to manage it and we have ability to do	a recreational		
program if the Board wanted us to.						
Mr. Harding:  Would that cost?					
Mr. Flint:  Yes because that would require staff that we do not currently have onsite, so		
there would be a cost to that but we do	it for other CDD's.  We are able to do that but in the past		
the desire has been to have some synergy between the District and the Resort and not have two		
competing social interest.  The only problem with that is not			
					everyone is a member of the Resort		
and that is where you end up having some potential issues.			
Mr. Grant:  There are certain easement opportunities to discuss, the Resort managing the		
facility for the CDD and managing a	schedule of usage, but at the same time the Resort may be		
					
hosting a		I think that would be a healthy discussion at the right time.			
wedding.				
Mr. Greenstein:  That is why I said that we need to, in the next quarter, focus on how we		
see this facility used down the road.  Based upon the way things are now or how they were in		

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January

Page

12, 10

201	7	
of 13	

the past, we could have a different future. I know at one time we actually mentioned to Encore that we would like to have people come in prior to 10:00 a.m. to do yoga and because they were conducting business and having a Real Estate office we thought that was courteous of us to let them know that was happening. They approved it and people walked away thinking that it was approved yoga at Heritage Crossing. It is very substantial resource and asset.
Mr.	Harding:  What should we do in the meantime for this area?			
				
Mr.	Grant:  I propose for the next 90-days until we have that discussion, but I think the		
District Management can handle this little space.			
Mr.	Greenstein:	I think we should keep this space low-key because we do	not know		
					
what kind of request we will get for use of this room.  I think yoga is controllable for	an hour a		
day, twice a week.				
Mr.	Goldstein:	I had heard it was getting crowded for yoga in here.  You guys let the		
				
Resort know there is yoga going on correct?			
Mr.	Grant:  No.				
Mr.	Harding:  There has to be some liability issues, so maybe low-key for now but we		
			
need to come up with some answers down the road.			
Mr.	d' Adesky:	It is a significant conversation and you have to talk about the purpose.		
Encore  use was a  limited use for a limited period of time,  so you are going to  look going		
forward, and we have to look on our side going forward is this a public purpose and something		
that the community				
	benefits?  It is a process that would be good to start a head oftime.			

ii.

Approval

of

the Check Register

Mr. Flint:  You have the check register for the month of December for the General Fund,		
Renewal  and  Replacement  Maintenance  Fund,  and	Payroll  totaling  in  the  amount  of		
				
$1,272,263.18.  If there are any				
questions we can discuss it.  There is a $1,134,000 check that is		
transferring money to the Debt Service Trust account, so that is the majority of that.  You will		
see that on page 3 to Reunion East CDD care of U.S. Bank.  That assessment revenue comes in		
one check and we have to transfer it to the Trustee for the Debt Service so a large portion of		
those expenses are just moving that	assessment revenue from the General Fund into the Debt		
			
Service.  It comes in late November, early December, and we get it all the way through March		
and it even goes into April and May.  We have been over 100% collected every year and that is		
because we have the tax bill as the collection method.			

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12, 2017

Page 11 of 13

Mr.			
Dryburgh:  The balance sheet and income statement is very confusing when you start		
looking at your budget because it is so far off.		
Mr. Flint:  It is on a cash basis, so for example, in the General Fund the majority of our		
assessment revenue comes in, and if you look in		
	October, we are in a negative position on our		
budget because our assessment revenue doesn't come in until November or December.  Then		
you will see it goes away but you continue to have expenses.		
On MOTION by Mr. Greenstein, seconded by Mr. Dryburgh, with		
all  in  favor,  the  Check	Register  totaling  in  the  amount  of		
			
$1,272,263.18 was approved.		

iii.

Balance Sheet and Income Statement

	Mr. Flint:  These are through	November	30	th	if you look at the statement of revenue		
					,  so			
and	expenditures  on  page  2  you  will see  that  out  of $1,000,092  we  have  only  collected		
			
$134,000.  That is what we were just talking about and that revenue will change significantly in		
December because  a large majority	of the revenue  comes  in December.	If you looked in		
October it would be worse than this so it would be $0 actual against a million dollar budget'.		
	Mr.										
		Greenstein:  There is a cost to having a		collection through Osceola County.  I would		
									
say	95% of good escrow wages are going to pay	it in the first month, which gives you the		
biggest discount so how do we allow for that?								
	Mr.	Flint:  We actually make money off of that because that is why we are over 100%		
collected.	If we are  going to  collect $100, we have to budget $106 and	$2	of that is the		
collection cost from the  County and $4 of that is the  early payment discount.	We have to		
budget as	if everyone is paying in November.	If they don't pay in November, but pay in		
December, January, February, we are budgeting a 4%	discount and we may be giving a 2%		
										
discount or zero.										
	Mr.	Greenstein:  99% of that is probably paid in November.				
						
	Mr.	Flint:  We are budgeting a 4% discount and they are getting it, so we are not losing		
anything on that.  We have to do it that way because of the Trust Indenture and everything else.		
Are there any										
		questions on the financials?  Your							
					expenses are pretty in line except that we have		
some expenses that aren't	necessarily	1/lth a month and do not line up with the proration.		

iv.

Status

of

Direct Bill Assessments

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January 12,

Page 12

2017 of 13

Mr. Flint:  East is paid and we just got the checks in.  Citicommunities has paid, LRA	
Orlando paid, and we got in EHOF's payments yesterday.  For East we are in good shape but	
West has not been paid yet.		
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business	

Mr.

Flint:  Mark Yahn has recommended that we finish this last piece, which is about

$6,000.

Mr.	Scheerer:  As the Board is aware, Sunscape	Consulting came in with a proposal to		

trim all of the trees from Reunion						
		Boulevard at the main gate to the traffic circle and then from		
the traffic circle to Sparkling Court.	It is Mark's recommendation that the Board consider that		
this is not budgeted, which is why it is in front of you today.  He would like to complete the		
hardwood trimming as soon as possible.  He sent us this	proposal a few days ago and it wasn't		
							
here in time for the agenda.	It is his recommendation that we finish the trimming and that		
would complete all of the							
	hardwoods and we also have a more aggressive schedule that we will		
look forward to on the 2018 budget to	continue to address the trees.  It is such a big difference		
						
coming in here at the Reunion Boulevard gate and it creates an open space for traffic and foot		
traffic so it is just for your consideration.  There is money	available in the budget if the Board		
								
chooses to move forward with this and the cost is $6,100.				

On MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded by Mr. in favor, the hardwood tree trimming project $6,100 was approved.

Goldstein, with in the amount

all of

Mr.  Scheerer:	We  allocated  money  in  this  year's  budget  for  pressure  cleaning  of		
common area sidewalks, curbs, and CDD property only.  I did speak with David Burman but he		
is out of town this week, but when he gets back he has a		
		gentleman at the Resort that the POA		
has used that is even cheaper than the current person that we received this quote from.  Once		
David gets back I am	going to make contact with his contractor and try the one through the		
community, and at a	future  Board	meeting we will bring back to the Board a proposal for		
				
pressure				
washing that was included in the budget for 201 7.		
EIGTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor's Request		

There not being

any,

the

next item

as

followed.

Reunion East CDD

Regular Meeting

January

Page

12, 13

2017 of 13

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

February 9, 2017.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS There being no further business,

Next Meeting Date

Adjournment

On all

MOTION by Mr. Harding, seconded in favor, the meeting was adjourned at

by Mr. Greenstein, with 2:51 p.m.

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman